VS
Purpose Best Ideas Fund ETF (PBI) and BMO U.S. All Cap Equity Fund ETF (ZACE) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that PBI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while ZACE leans towards Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, PBI features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.75% for ZACE. Performance-wise, PBI has returned 8.38% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas ZACE is at 14.73% with -$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PBI
ZACE
| AuM | $10.21 M | $60.35 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.80% | 0.80% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBI | -0.02% | +4.10% | +8.38% | +6.26% | +92.51% |
ZACE | -0.53% | +2.19% | +14.73% | +10.89% | +102.79% | |
| Flows | PBI | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$0 M | -$3 M | -$6 M |
ZACE | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$7 M | -$8 M | +$14 M |
PBI vs ZACE exposure
Countries
PBI
USA
81.94%
Other
18.06%
ZACE
USA
92.52%
Other
7.48%
Sectors
PBI
Technology
36.66%
Finance
17.46%
Healthcare
15.55%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.86%
Industrials
9.15%
Other
11.31%
ZACE
Technology
40.02%
Finance
18.04%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.66%
Industrials
8.69%
Healthcare
7.92%
Other
14.67%
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PBI
Illumina, Inc.
4.53%
DoorDash, Inc.
4.45%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.21%
Danaher Corp.
3.76%
Microsoft Corp.
3.71%
Block, Inc.
3.68%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.62%
MercadoLibre, Inc.
3.54%
Visa, Inc.
3.52%
Nu Holdings Ltd.
3.40%
ZACE
Apple, Inc.
8.80%
Microsoft Corp.
5.83%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.49%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.36%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.20%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
3.13%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.79%
Shopify, Inc.
2.38%
Broadcom Inc.
2.29%
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
1.91%
Diversification
PBI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
38.42%
ZACE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 58 total
39.19%
Characteristics
Compare
PBI
ZACE
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 29, 2014 | June 10, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about PBI and ZACE
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PBI or ZACE?
As of October 27, 2026, PBI has returned 8.38% year to date, while ZACE has returned 14.73%. ZACE is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PBI or ZACE?
As of October 27, 2026, PBI manages $10.21 M in assets, while ZACE manages $60.35 M. ZACE is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PBI and ZACE managed?
PBI is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZACE is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do PBI and ZACE emphasize?
PBI is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. ZACE is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PBI or ZACE?
Year to date, PBI has seen -$0.28 M in net flows, compared with -$6.76 M for ZACE. PBI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PBI and ZACE compare?
PBI has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while ZACE has an expense ratio of 0.80%.
What are the top holdings of PBI and ZACE?
PBI's largest holdings include Illumina, Inc., DoorDash, Inc., and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.. ZACE's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PBI or ZACE?
PBI holds 30 securities, while ZACE holds 58. On holdings count, ZACE is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about PBI and ZACE
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.