PDF
Purpose Core Dividend Fund ETF

Full PDF fund page
VS
XDIV
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF

Full XDIV fund page

Compare Purpose Core Dividend Fund ETF (PDF) vs iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV) to find the best fit for your portfolio. PDF provides Finance, Energy, and Healthcare exposures, while XDIV is primarily weighted in Finance, Energy, and Utilities. When evaluating costs, PDF features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.1% for XDIV. Performance-wise, PDF has returned 19.79% year-to-date with -$36 M in net flows, whereas XDIV is at 28.77% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.0%Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9Sep 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 18, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
PDF
-1.01%+3.11%+19.79%+27.11%+68.82%
XDIV
-0.39%+6.26%+28.77%+41.09%+107.76%
Flows
PDF
-$0 M+$1 M-$36 M+$9 M+$8 M
XDIV
+$149 M+$477 M+$1,457 M+$1,964 M+$3,527 M

PDF vs XDIV exposure

Countries

PDF
Canada
70.83%
USA
21.43%
Other
7.75%
XDIV
Canada
95.43%

Sectors

PDF
Finance
36.43%
Energy
13.65%
Other
7.75%
Healthcare
7.52%
Other
34.65%
XDIV
Finance
47.81%
Energy
28.87%
Utilities
9.39%
Other
13.94%
As of September 18, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

PDF
The Bank of Nova Scotia
5.46%
Royal Bank of Canada
5.29%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
4.91%
Manulife Financial Corp.
4.52%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.62%
Power Corp of Canada
3.61%
TC Energy Corp.
3.44%
Bank of Montreal
3.02%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
2.83%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
2.83%
XDIV
Manulife Financial Corp.
9.89%
Royal Bank of Canada
9.62%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
9.33%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
8.48%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
8.06%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
8.04%
Power Corp of Canada
6.54%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
5.41%
Fortis, Inc.
5.40%
Restaurant Brands International, Inc.
4.41%

Diversification

PDF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 52 total
39.53%
XDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21 total
75.18%

Characteristics

Compare
PDF
XDIV
ProviderPurpose InvestmentsiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.57%3.08%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 3, 2013June 7, 2017

Frequently asked questions about PDF and XDIV

Which ETF has performed better year to date: PDF or XDIV?
As of September 18, 2026, PDF has returned 19.79% year to date, while XDIV has returned 28.77%. XDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PDF or XDIV?
As of September 18, 2026, PDF manages $250.16 M in assets, while XDIV manages $6.31 B. XDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PDF and XDIV managed?
PDF is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. XDIV is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do PDF and XDIV emphasize?
PDF is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Healthcare. XDIV is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PDF or XDIV?
Year to date, PDF has seen -$36.31 M in net flows, compared with +$1,456.93 M for XDIV. XDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PDF and XDIV compare?
PDF has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while XDIV has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
What are the top holdings of PDF and XDIV?
PDF's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. XDIV's top holdings include Manulife Financial Corp., Royal Bank of Canada, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Which ETF is more diversified: PDF or XDIV?
PDF holds 52 securities, while XDIV holds 21. On holdings count, PDF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about PDF and XDIV

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds