VS
Purpose Real Estate Income Fund ETF (PHR) and iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that PHR focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Healthcare, and Industrials, while CIF leans towards Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, PHR features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for CIF. Performance-wise, PHR has returned 6.32% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas CIF is at 19.09% with +$466 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PHR
CIF
| AuM | $6.02 M | $1,571.86 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.82% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PHR | +1.47% | -5.79% | +6.32% | +6.45% | +30.31% |
CIF | -2.46% | -4.14% | +19.09% | +13.47% | +102.53% | |
| Flows | PHR | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$12 M |
CIF | +$23 M | +$49 M | +$466 M | +$528 M | +$833 M |
PHR vs CIF exposure
Countries
PHR
Canada
56.78%
USA
36.71%
CIF
USA
38.91%
Canada
34.87%
Brazil
7.55%
Other
18.67%
Sectors
PHR
Finance
86.88%
Other
13.12%
CIF
Utilities
42.80%
Industrials
28.15%
Energy
23.95%
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PHR
Chartwell Retirement Residences
5.45%
Flagship Communities Real Estate Investment Trust
5.45%
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
4.99%
Dream Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust
4.61%
Killam Apartment REIT
4.56%
Prologis, Inc.
4.14%
Sienna Senior Living, Inc.
3.95%
Primaris Real Estate Investment Trust
3.84%
BSR Real Estate Investment Trust
3.76%
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
3.63%
CIF
ATCO Ltd.
5.10%
Edison International
4.90%
Targa Resources Corp.
4.52%
Caterpillar, Inc.
4.06%
Scorpio Tankers, Inc.
3.95%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
3.77%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
3.61%
Enel Chile SA
3.45%
UGI Corp.
3.20%
Stantec, Inc.
3.11%
Diversification
PHR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
44.38%
CIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
39.66%
Characteristics
Compare
PHR
CIF
| Provider | Purpose Investments | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.95% | 1.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 29, 2014 | August 27, 2008 |
Frequently asked questions about PHR and CIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PHR or CIF?
As of November 2, 2026, PHR has returned 6.32% year to date, while CIF has returned 19.09%. CIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PHR or CIF?
As of November 2, 2026, PHR manages $6.02 M in assets, while CIF manages $1.57 B. CIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PHR and CIF managed?
PHR is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. CIF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do PHR and CIF emphasize?
PHR is most exposed to Finance, Healthcare, and Industrials. CIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PHR or CIF?
Year to date, PHR has seen -$0.52 M in net flows, compared with +$465.61 M for CIF. CIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PHR and CIF compare?
PHR has an expense ratio of 0.82%, while CIF has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of PHR and CIF?
PHR's largest holdings include Chartwell Retirement Residences and Flagship Communities Real Estate Investment Trust. CIF's top holdings include ATCO Ltd., Edison International, and Targa Resources Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: PHR or CIF?
PHR holds 37 securities, while CIF holds 60. On holdings count, CIF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about PHR and CIF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.