VS
When evaluating costs, PHW features a management fee (MER) of 0.8%, compared to 0.65% for UMAX. Performance-wise, PHW has returned 11.9% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas UMAX is at 9.51% with +$474 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PHW
UMAX
| AuM | $2.05 M | $1,474.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.80% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.77% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PHW | +0.57% | -0.88% | +11.90% | +10.26% | +43.74% |
UMAX | +7.65% | +2.03% | +9.51% | +9.43% | +33.15% | |
| Flows | PHW | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$4 M | -$4 M | -$3 M |
UMAX | -$26 M | +$38 M | +$474 M | +$539 M | +$1,436 M |
PHW vs UMAX exposure
Countries
PHW
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
PHW
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PHW
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
PHW
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
PHW
UMAX
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 7.23% | 13.96% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 22, 2015 | June 14, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about PHW and UMAX
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PHW or UMAX?
As of November 11, 2026, PHW has returned 11.90% year to date, while UMAX has returned 9.51%. PHW is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PHW or UMAX?
As of November 11, 2026, PHW manages $2.05 M in assets, while UMAX manages $1.47 B. UMAX is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PHW and UMAX managed?
PHW is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. UMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PHW or UMAX?
Year to date, PHW has seen -$3.83 M in net flows, compared with +$473.85 M for UMAX. UMAX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PHW and UMAX compare?
PHW has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while UMAX has an expense ratio of 0.77%.
Recent articles about PHW and UMAX
Yield-focused ETFs and the Benefit They Can Provide Investors
ETFs that employ covered call-writing strategies can be effective ways to generate monthly yield for investors while still providing exposure to a security or asset class on a long-term basis.
Posted on 6/13/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.