PPLN
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index ETF - CAD

Full PPLN fund page
VS
UTIL
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF

Full UTIL fund page

Compare Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index ETF - CAD (PPLN) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index ETF (UTIL) to find the best fit for your portfolio. PPLN and UTIL provide the same top sector exposures: Energy. When evaluating costs, PPLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.74%, compared to 0.61% for UTIL. Performance-wise, PPLN has returned 27.98% year-to-date with +$27 M in net flows, whereas UTIL is at 13.83% with -$10 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.08.0%Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15Oct 22Oct 29

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 30, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
PPLN
+8.26%-4.36%+27.98%+34.18%+67.74%
UTIL
+4.60%-5.37%+13.83%+11.53%+64.95%
Flows
PPLN
+$17 M+$30 M+$27 M+$96 M+$109 M
UTIL
-$1 M-$3 M-$10 M-$5 M+$8 M

PPLN vs UTIL exposure

Countries

PPLN
Canada
99.32%
UTIL
Canada
99.33%

Sectors

PPLN
Energy
99.32%
UTIL
Energy
99.33%
As of October 30, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

PPLN
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
20.42%
South Bow Corp.
20.38%
Keyera Corp.
19.77%
TC Energy Corp.
19.44%
Enbridge, Inc.
19.31%
UTIL
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
20.42%
South Bow Corp.
20.39%
Keyera Corp.
19.77%
TC Energy Corp.
19.44%
Enbridge, Inc.
19.31%

Diversification

PPLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5 total
99.32%
UTIL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5 total
99.33%

Characteristics

Compare
PPLN
UTIL
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CADMirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield4.68%3.84%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJuly 14, 2014August 9, 2022

Frequently asked questions about PPLN and UTIL

Which ETF has performed better year to date: PPLN or UTIL?
As of October 30, 2026, PPLN has returned 27.98% year to date, while UTIL has returned 13.83%. PPLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PPLN or UTIL?
As of October 30, 2026, PPLN manages $166.16 M in assets, while UTIL manages $22.33 M. PPLN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PPLN and UTIL managed?
PPLN is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD benchmark. UTIL is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Utilities Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do PPLN and UTIL emphasize?
PPLN is most exposed to Energy. UTIL is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PPLN or UTIL?
Year to date, PPLN has seen +$27.22 M in net flows, compared with -$9.55 M for UTIL. PPLN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PPLN and UTIL compare?
PPLN has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while UTIL has an expense ratio of 0.35%.
What are the top holdings of PPLN and UTIL?
PPLN's largest holdings include Pembina Pipeline Corp., South Bow Corp., and Keyera Corp.. UTIL's top holdings include Pembina Pipeline Corp., South Bow Corp., and Keyera Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: PPLN or UTIL?
PPLN holds 5 securities, while UTIL holds 5. On holdings count, PPLN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about PPLN and UTIL

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds