VS
When evaluating costs, PRA features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.75% for RTA. Performance-wise, PRA has returned 27.5% year-to-date with +$152 M in net flows, whereas RTA is at 10.56% with +$48 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PRA
RTA
| AuM | $284.63 M | $347.58 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.91% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRA | +0.46% | +1.90% | +27.50% | +29.87% | +70.17% |
RTA | +0.19% | +0.96% | +10.56% | +11.41% | +46.33% | |
| Flows | PRA | +$23 M | +$49 M | +$152 M | +$164 M | +$175 M |
RTA | +$17 M | +$24 M | +$48 M | +$55 M | +$26 M |
PRA vs RTA exposure
Countries
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
RTA
Canada
48.76%
USA
27.95%
Other
21.36%
Sectors
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
RTA
Other
21.36%
Sovereign
20.84%
Finance
15.82%
Technology
12.12%
Municipal
7.72%
Other
22.15%
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
RTA
CA92203G1063
49.99%
US78462F1030
24.83%
US46090E1038
10.27%
CA37961W1086
5.96%
CA74643B1031
2.89%
US9219378273
2.84%
CA55453U1093
2.50%
CA74642X1069
0.67%
Diversification
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
RTA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 4,568 total
99.94%
Characteristics
Compare
PRA
RTA
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Commodity, Currencies, Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.07% | 3.58% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 5, 2013 | May 11, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about PRA and RTA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PRA or RTA?
As of October 29, 2026, PRA has returned 27.50% year to date, while RTA has returned 10.56%. PRA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PRA or RTA?
As of October 29, 2026, PRA manages $284.63 M in assets, while RTA manages $347.58 M. RTA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PRA and RTA managed?
PRA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. RTA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PRA or RTA?
Year to date, PRA has seen +$152.38 M in net flows, compared with +$47.94 M for RTA. PRA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PRA and RTA compare?
PRA has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while RTA has an expense ratio of 0.91%.
Recent articles about PRA and RTA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.