QCH
Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 Index ETF

Full QCH fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 Index ETF (QCH) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that QCH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials, while HEWB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, QCH features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, QCH has returned 7.92% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 25.26% with +$14 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-20246810%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
QCH
-1.82%+5.41%+7.92%+34.17%+43.94%
HEWB
+8.44%+23.64%+25.26%+67.67%+147.54%
Flows
QCH
+$0 M+$2 M+$2 M+$0 M+$0 M
HEWB
+$2 M+$10 M+$14 M+$11 M+$16 M

QCH vs HEWB exposure

Countries

QCH
China
100.00%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

QCH
Information Technology
23.68%
Financials
20.37%
Industrials
17.46%
Materials
10.68%
Consumer Staples
7.68%
Other
20.14%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

QCH
AMPEREX TECH
4.57%
ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT
3.81%
MOUTAI
3.50%
CN PING AN
2.38%
ZIJIN MINING
2.18%
EOPTOLINK TECHNOLOGY INC
2.09%
MERCHANTS BANK
1.88%
MIDEA GROUP
1.54%
LUXSHARE
1.31%
YANGTZE POWER
1.29%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

QCH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 285 total
24.55%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
QCH
HEWB
ProviderMackenzie InvestmentsGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCSI 300 Index - CNYSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.22%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 1, 2018January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about QCH and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: QCH or HEWB?
As of June 11, 2026, QCH has returned 7.92% year to date, while HEWB has returned 25.26%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QCH or HEWB?
As of June 11, 2026, QCH manages $31.99 M in assets, while HEWB manages $317.93 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QCH and HEWB managed?
QCH is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the CSI 300 Index - CNY benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QCH and HEWB emphasize?
QCH is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QCH or HEWB?
Year to date, QCH has seen +$1.73 M in net flows, compared with +$14.05 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QCH and HEWB compare?
QCH has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of QCH and HEWB?
QCH's largest holdings include AMPEREX TECH, ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT, and MOUTAI. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QCH or HEWB?
QCH holds 273 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, QCH is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about QCH and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds