VS
Compare Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 Index ETF (QCH) vs iShares China Index ETF (XCH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. QCH provides Technology, Finance, and Industrials exposures, while XCH is primarily weighted in Finance, Technology, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, QCH features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.85% for XCH. Performance-wise, QCH has returned 2.67% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas XCH is at 7.39% with -$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QCH
XCH
| AuM | $31.47 M | $177.60 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.85% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.86% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCH | -4.54% | -10.32% | -2.67% | -4.72% | +35.29% |
XCH | -0.55% | -2.74% | -7.39% | -14.10% | +43.19% | |
| Flows | QCH | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$5 M | +$5 M | +$2 M |
XCH | -$2 M | -$6 M | -$1 M | -$5 M | +$79 M |
QCH vs XCH exposure
Countries
QCH
China
100.00%
XCH
China
94.38%
Sectors
QCH
Technology
30.16%
Finance
20.73%
Industrials
17.02%
Non-Energy Materials
9.82%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.77%
Other
13.49%
XCH
Finance
37.91%
Technology
21.52%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.42%
Consumer Cyclicals
8.76%
Other
21.39%
As of November 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QCH
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
3.98%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.10%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
3.08%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.43%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
2.26%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.02%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
1.98%
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
1.64%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
1.61%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
1.39%
XCH
US4642871846
99.95%
Diversification
QCH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 284 total
23.49%
XCH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 51 total
99.95%
Characteristics
Compare
QCH
XCH
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CSI 300 Index - CNY | FTSE China 50 Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.36% | 1.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2018 | January 21, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about QCH and XCH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QCH or XCH?
As of November 10, 2026, QCH has returned -2.67% year to date, while XCH has returned -7.39%. QCH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QCH or XCH?
As of November 10, 2026, QCH manages $31.47 M in assets, while XCH manages $177.60 M. XCH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QCH and XCH managed?
QCH is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the CSI 300 Index - CNY benchmark. XCH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE China 50 Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: QCH or XCH?
QCH holds 284 securities, while XCH holds 1. On holdings count, QCH is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QCH or XCH?
Year to date, QCH has seen +$4.57 M in net flows, compared with -$1.50 M for XCH. QCH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QCH and XCH compare?
QCH has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while XCH has an expense ratio of 0.86%.
What sectors do QCH and XCH emphasize?
QCH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. XCH is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Recent articles about QCH and XCH
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.