VS
Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 Index ETF (QCH) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that QCH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials, while ZUT leans towards Utilities. When evaluating costs, QCH features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, QCH has returned 7.92% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 20.18% with -$66 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QCH
ZUT
| AuM | $31.99 M | $901.76 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.90% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCH | -1.82% | +5.41% | +7.92% | +34.17% | +43.94% |
ZUT | +3.71% | +8.83% | +20.18% | +27.67% | +47.40% | |
| Flows | QCH | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
ZUT | -$4 M | +$15 M | -$66 M | +$132 M | +$243 M |
QCH vs ZUT exposure
Countries
QCH
China
100.00%
ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%
Sectors
QCH
Information Technology
23.68%
Financials
20.37%
Industrials
17.46%
Materials
10.68%
Consumer Staples
7.68%
Other
20.14%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QCH
AMPEREX TECH
4.57%
ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT
3.81%
MOUTAI
3.50%
CN PING AN
2.38%
ZIJIN MINING
2.18%
EOPTOLINK TECHNOLOGY INC
2.09%
MERCHANTS BANK
1.88%
MIDEA GROUP
1.54%
LUXSHARE
1.31%
YANGTZE POWER
1.29%
ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%
Diversification
QCH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 285 total
24.55%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%
Characteristics
Compare
QCH
ZUT
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CSI 300 Index - CNY | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.22% | 2.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2018 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about QCH and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QCH or ZUT?
As of June 11, 2026, QCH has returned 7.92% year to date, while ZUT has returned 20.18%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QCH or ZUT?
As of June 11, 2026, QCH manages $31.99 M in assets, while ZUT manages $901.76 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QCH and ZUT managed?
QCH is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the CSI 300 Index - CNY benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QCH and ZUT emphasize?
QCH is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QCH or ZUT?
Year to date, QCH has seen +$1.73 M in net flows, compared with -$65.77 M for ZUT. QCH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QCH and ZUT compare?
QCH has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of QCH and ZUT?
QCH's largest holdings include AMPEREX TECH, ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT, and MOUTAI. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and ALTAGAS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QCH or ZUT?
QCH holds 273 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, QCH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about QCH and ZUT
China’s Market Surge: ETFs Offering Exposure to the Rally
AI breakthroughs and new policy reforms are powering a sharp rally in Chinese equities.
Posted on 8/29/2025 by Kyle Anthony inChina
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.