QMVP
Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF

Full QMVP fund page
VS
TEC
TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF

Full TEC fund page

Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that QMVP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary, while TEC leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, QMVP features a management fee (MER) of 0.19%, compared to 0.35% for TEC. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

05101520%Mar 27Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 27, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
QMVP
+20.30%+4.99%---
TEC
+18.67%+3.90%+4.65%+39.09%+120.34%
Flows
QMVP
+$0 M+$87 M---
TEC
+$287 M+$519 M+$594 M+$759 M+$1,327 M

QMVP vs TEC exposure

Countries

QMVP
USA
99.90%
TEC
USA
87.50%
Other
12.50%

Sectors

QMVP
Information Technology
63.60%
Communication Services
18.10%
Consumer Discretionary
14.90%
TEC
Information Technology
64.07%
Communication Services
16.04%
Consumer Discretionary
12.17%
Other
7.72%
As of April 27, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

QMVP
NVIDIA
6.40%
BROADCOM LIMITED
6.40%
APPLE
5.90%
TESLA
5.80%
AMAZON.COM INC
5.70%
MICROSOFT-T
5.70%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.50%
META PLATFORMS
5.40%
NETFLIX
3.90%
APPLIED MATERIAL
3.70%
TEC
NVIDIA
12.90%
APPLE
11.81%
MICROSOFT-T
8.63%
AMAZON.COM INC
6.28%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.26%
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.61%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.55%
META PLATFORMS
3.76%
TESLA
3.46%
ASML HOLDING
1.66%

Diversification

QMVP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
54.40%
TEC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 205 total
62.92%

Characteristics

Compare
QMVP
TEC
ProviderHamilton ETFsTD Asset Management
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Technology Index TR - CADSolactive Global Technology Leaders NTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-0.11%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 20, 2026May 9, 2019

Frequently asked questions about QMVP and TEC

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QMVP or TEC?
As of April 27, 2026, QMVP manages $267.54 M in assets, while TEC manages $4.54 B. TEC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QMVP and TEC managed?
QMVP is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Technology Index TR - CAD benchmark. TEC is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Technology Leaders NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QMVP and TEC emphasize?
QMVP is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. TEC is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
How do the fees of QMVP and TEC compare?
QMVP has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while TEC has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of QMVP and TEC?
QMVP's largest holdings include NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED, and APPLE. TEC's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: QMVP or TEC?
QMVP holds 25 securities, while TEC holds 196. On holdings count, TEC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about QMVP and TEC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds