QMVP
Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF

Full QMVP fund page
VS
ZQQ
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF

Full ZQQ fund page

Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZQQ) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that QMVP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary, while ZQQ leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, QMVP features a management fee (MER) of 0.19%, compared to 0.35% for ZQQ. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

051015%Apr 1Apr 9Apr 16Apr 23Apr 30

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
QMVP
+16.92%+7.96%---
ZQQ
+14.74%+6.69%+8.58%+37.16%+101.24%
Flows
QMVP
-$1 M+$35 M---
ZQQ
+$71 M-$21 M-$56 M+$151 M+$135 M

QMVP vs ZQQ exposure

Countries

QMVP
USA
99.90%
ZQQ
USA
96.36%

Sectors

QMVP
Information Technology
63.60%
Communication Services
18.10%
Consumer Discretionary
14.90%
ZQQ
Information Technology
48.57%
Communication Services
15.23%
Consumer Discretionary
12.56%
Consumer Staples
8.83%
Other
14.80%
As of May 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

QMVP
NVIDIA
6.40%
BROADCOM LIMITED
6.40%
APPLE
5.90%
TESLA
5.80%
MICROSOFT-T
5.70%
AMAZON.COM INC
5.70%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.50%
META PLATFORMS
5.40%
NETFLIX
3.90%
APPLIED MATERIAL
3.70%
ZQQ
NVIDIA
8.51%
APPLE
7.68%
MICROSOFT-T
5.65%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.57%
TESLA
3.76%
WALMART INC
3.53%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.38%
META PLATFORMS
3.36%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.15%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.95%

Diversification

QMVP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
54.40%
ZQQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
46.55%

Characteristics

Compare
QMVP
ZQQ
ProviderHamilton ETFsBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Technology Index TR - CADNASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-0.25%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 20, 2026January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about QMVP and ZQQ

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QMVP or ZQQ?
As of May 1, 2026, QMVP manages $274.45 M in assets, while ZQQ manages $2.97 B. ZQQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QMVP and ZQQ managed?
QMVP is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive HAMILTON CHAMPIONS U.S. Technology Index TR - CAD benchmark. ZQQ is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QMVP and ZQQ emphasize?
QMVP is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. ZQQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
How do the fees of QMVP and ZQQ compare?
QMVP has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while ZQQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of QMVP and ZQQ?
QMVP's largest holdings include NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED, and APPLE. ZQQ's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: QMVP or ZQQ?
QMVP holds 25 securities, while ZQQ holds 93. On holdings count, ZQQ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about QMVP and ZQQ

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds