VS
Compare CI Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQC) vs iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ) to find the best fit for your portfolio. QQC and XQQ provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, QQC features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.35% for XQQ. Performance-wise, QQC has returned 17.14% year-to-date with +$969 M in net flows, whereas XQQ is at 10.61% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQC
XQQ
| AuM | $2,575.46 M | $5,798.23 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.23% | -0.55% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQC | -6.94% | -1.61% | +17.14% | +13.39% | +91.34% |
XQQ | -7.29% | -4.18% | +10.61% | +9.15% | +76.01% | |
| Flows | QQC | +$260 M | +$390 M | +$969 M | +$1,038 M | +$1,885 M |
XQQ | +$137 M | +$576 M | +$1,144 M | +$1,171 M | +$1,695 M |
QQC vs XQQ exposure
Countries
QQC
USA
95.70%
XQQ
USA
94.55%
Sectors
QQC
Technology
68.84%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.80%
Other
20.36%
XQQ
Technology
68.30%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.52%
Other
21.19%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQC
US46138G6492
101.10%
XQQ
NVIDIA Corp.
8.35%
Apple, Inc.
7.37%
Microsoft Corp.
5.78%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.04%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.18%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.08%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.27%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.86%
Tesla, Inc.
2.83%
Diversification
QQC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
101.10%
XQQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
46.83%
Characteristics
Compare
QQC
XQQ
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD | NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.31% | 0.23% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 26, 2021 | May 3, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about QQC and XQQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQC or XQQ?
As of November 11, 2026, QQC has returned 17.14% year to date, while XQQ has returned 10.61%. QQC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQC or XQQ?
As of November 11, 2026, QQC manages $2.58 B in assets, while XQQ manages $5.80 B. XQQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQC and XQQ managed?
QQC is passively managed by CI. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XQQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: QQC or XQQ?
QQC holds 1 securities, while XQQ holds 100. On holdings count, XQQ is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQC or XQQ?
Year to date, QQC has seen +$969.06 M in net flows, compared with +$1,143.90 M for XQQ. XQQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQC and XQQ compare?
QQC has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while XQQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What sectors do QQC and XQQ emphasize?
QQC is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. XQQ is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
Recent articles about QQC and XQQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.