VS
Compare Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ) vs CI Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. QQQQ and QQC provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, QQQQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.2% for QQC. Performance-wise, QQQQ has returned 16.45% year-to-date with +$124 M in net flows, whereas QQC is at 17.32% with +$641 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQQQ
QQC
| AuM | $140.02 M | $2,255.36 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.25% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.37% | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQQ | -3.16% | -5.71% | +16.45% | +20.70% | - |
QQC | -2.64% | -3.30% | +17.32% | +21.78% | +99.36% | |
| Flows | QQQQ | +$3 M | +$112 M | +$124 M | +$135 M | - |
QQC | +$53 M | +$261 M | +$641 M | +$816 M | +$1,567 M |
QQQQ vs QQC exposure
Countries
QQQQ
USA
94.38%
QQC
USA
94.31%
Sectors
QQQQ
Technology
67.74%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.03%
Other
20.24%
QQC
Technology
66.49%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.41%
Other
21.10%
As of September 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQQQ
Apple, Inc.
8.17%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.88%
Microsoft Corp.
5.59%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.54%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.23%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.65%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
3.07%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.66%
QQC
Apple, Inc.
8.56%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.93%
Microsoft Corp.
5.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.20%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
3.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.99%
Diversification
QQQQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
46.07%
QQC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
45.54%
Characteristics
Compare
QQQQ
QQC
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 Notional Net Return 15% Index - CAD | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.09% | 0.33% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 19, 2025 | May 26, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about QQQQ and QQC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQQQ or QQC?
As of September 15, 2026, QQQQ has returned 16.45% year to date, while QQC has returned 17.32%. QQC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQQQ or QQC?
As of September 15, 2026, QQQQ manages $140.02 M in assets, while QQC manages $2.26 B. QQC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQQQ and QQC managed?
QQQQ is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Notional Net Return 15% Index - CAD benchmark. QQC is passively managed by CI. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QQQQ and QQC emphasize?
QQQQ is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. QQC is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQQQ or QQC?
Year to date, QQQQ has seen +$123.69 M in net flows, compared with +$641.33 M for QQC. QQC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQQQ and QQC compare?
QQQQ has an expense ratio of 0.25%, while QQC has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of QQQQ and QQC?
QQQQ's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. QQC's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QQQQ or QQC?
QQQQ holds 102 securities, while QQC holds 102. On holdings count, QQQQ is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about QQQQ and QQC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.