VS
When evaluating costs, QQQY features a management fee (MER) of 2%, compared to 0.35% for ZQQ. Performance-wise, QQQY has returned 18.07% year-to-date with +$20 M in net flows, whereas ZQQ is at 16.29% with -$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQQY
ZQQ
| AuM | $133.90 M | $3,221.28 M |
| Management Fees | 2.00% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.74% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.60% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQY | -3.77% | +8.09% | +18.07% | +14.40% | +85.60% |
ZQQ | -1.65% | +7.04% | +16.29% | +12.59% | +99.73% | |
| Flows | QQQY | +$4 M | +$5 M | +$20 M | +$23 M | +$110 M |
ZQQ | +$86 M | +$168 M | -$8 M | -$7 M | +$241 M |
QQQY vs ZQQ exposure
Countries
QQQY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZQQ
USA
94.50%
Sectors
QQQY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZQQ
Technology
66.85%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.82%
Other
21.33%
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQQY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZQQ
NVIDIA Corp.
8.41%
Apple, Inc.
7.51%
Microsoft Corp.
6.10%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.65%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.58%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.36%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.23%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.99%
Broadcom Inc.
2.80%
Tesla, Inc.
2.79%
Diversification
QQQY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZQQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 102 total
46.40%
Characteristics
Compare
QQQY
ZQQ
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 12.03% | 0.23% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 13, 2023 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about QQQY and ZQQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQQY or ZQQ?
As of October 28, 2026, QQQY has returned 18.07% year to date, while ZQQ has returned 16.29%. QQQY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQQY or ZQQ?
As of October 28, 2026, QQQY manages $133.90 M in assets, while ZQQ manages $3.22 B. ZQQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQQY and ZQQ managed?
QQQY is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. ZQQ is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQQY or ZQQ?
Year to date, QQQY has seen +$19.54 M in net flows, compared with -$7.72 M for ZQQ. QQQY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQQY and ZQQ compare?
QQQY has an expense ratio of 0.74%, while ZQQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Recent articles about QQQY and ZQQ
Tech ETFs Plunge Amid Nasdaq-100 and S&P500 Decline
US markets fell sharply this week, with tech ETFs leading the decline. The S&P500 and Nasdaq 100 suffered heavy losses as semiconductor stocks came under acute pressure, dragging the tech sector down.
Posted on 9/9/2024 by ETF Market Canada inTechnology
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.