VS
When evaluating costs, RBND features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RBND
HBNK
| AuM | $1.92 M | $724.28 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.35% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RBND | -1.46% | -2.62% | - | - | - |
HBNK | -1.80% | +8.93% | +30.47% | +54.80% | +158.51% | |
| Flows | RBND | +$1 M | +$1 M | - | - | - |
HBNK | +$6 M | -$93 M | -$510 M | -$680 M | -$83 M |
RBND vs HBNK exposure
Countries
RBND
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%
Sectors
RBND
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RBND
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%
Diversification
RBND
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%
Characteristics
Compare
RBND
HBNK
| Provider | Russell Investment Management | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.63% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 18, 2026 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about RBND and HBNK
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RBND or HBNK?
As of September 2, 2026, RBND manages $1.92 M in assets, while HBNK manages $724.28 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RBND and HBNK managed?
RBND is actively managed by Russell Investment Management. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of RBND and HBNK compare?
RBND has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about RBND and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.