VS
When evaluating costs, RENG features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 1% for MAEC. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RENG
MAEC
| AuM | $4.05 M | $6.63 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 1.00% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.02% | 1.00% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RENG | +10.80% | +15.55% | +56.04% | +55.92% | +79.76% |
MAEC | +12.98% | +19.23% | - | - | - | |
| Flows | RENG | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$2 M |
MAEC | +$0 M | +$0 M | - | - | - |
RENG vs MAEC exposure
Countries
RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
MAEC
Canada
94.26%
Sectors
RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
MAEC
Energy
86.44%
Other
13.56%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
MAEC
Kelt Exploration Ltd.
5.22%
Spartan Delta Corp.
4.72%
Tourmaline Oil Corp.
4.61%
Surge Energy, Inc.
4.45%
Tenaz Energy Corp.
4.34%
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
4.24%
Black Diamond Group Ltd.
3.85%
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
3.83%
Advantage Energy Ltd.
3.73%
Valeura Energy, Inc.
3.72%
Diversification
RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
MAEC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 34 total
42.70%
Characteristics
Compare
RENG
MAEC
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | Middlefield |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.64% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 8, 2023 | March 18, 2026 |
Frequently asked questions about RENG and MAEC
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RENG or MAEC?
As of October 30, 2026, RENG manages $4.05 M in assets, while MAEC manages $6.63 M. MAEC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RENG and MAEC managed?
RENG is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. MAEC is actively managed by Middlefield. It does not track an index.
How do the fees of RENG and MAEC compare?
RENG has an expense ratio of 1.02%, while MAEC has an expense ratio of 1.00%.
Recent articles about RENG and MAEC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.