RGBM
Return Stacked Global Balanced & Macro ETF

Full RGBM fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, RGBM features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, RGBM has returned 16.78% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 35.86% with -$461 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.08.0%Jun 16Jun 23Jun 30Jul 7Jul 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RGBM
+0.49%+3.54%+16.78%+29.27%-
HBNK
+6.04%+19.91%+35.86%+71.53%+159.08%
Flows
RGBM
+$0 M+$1 M-$1 M-$1 M-
HBNK
-$44 M+$39 M-$461 M-$767 M+$3 M

RGBM vs HBNK exposure

Countries

RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
100.00%
As of July 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%

Diversification

RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
RGBM
HBNK
ProviderReturn Stacked ETFsGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.48%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 3, 2025July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about RGBM and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RGBM or HBNK?
As of July 16, 2026, RGBM has returned 16.78% year to date, while HBNK has returned 35.86%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RGBM or HBNK?
As of July 16, 2026, RGBM manages $32.52 M in assets, while HBNK manages $807.27 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RGBM and HBNK managed?
RGBM is actively managed by Return Stacked ETFs. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RGBM or HBNK?
Year to date, RGBM has seen -$0.75 M in net flows, compared with -$461.23 M for HBNK. RGBM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RGBM and HBNK compare?
RGBM has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about RGBM and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds