VS
When evaluating costs, RGCB features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RGCB
HBNK
| AuM | $0.98 M | $748.61 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.34% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RGCB | +0.87% | -1.11% | - | - | - |
HBNK | +5.36% | +1.68% | +35.21% | +46.18% | +178.73% | |
| Flows | RGCB | +$0 M | +$1 M | - | - | - |
HBNK | -$25 M | +$8 M | -$509 M | -$578 M | -$383 M |
RGCB vs HBNK exposure
Countries
RGCB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.73%
Sectors
RGCB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.73%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RGCB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.08%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.02%
Bank of Montreal
16.77%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.48%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.43%
National Bank of Canada
15.95%
Diversification
RGCB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.73%
Characteristics
Compare
RGCB
HBNK
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.59% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 12, 2026 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about RGCB and HBNK
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RGCB or HBNK?
As of November 11, 2026, RGCB manages $0.98 M in assets, while HBNK manages $748.61 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RGCB and HBNK managed?
RGCB is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of RGCB and HBNK compare?
RGCB has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about RGCB and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.