RIT
CI First Asset Canadian REIT ETF

Full RIT fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

Compare CI First Asset Canadian REIT ETF (RIT) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) to find the best fit for your portfolio. RIT provides Real Estate and Health Care exposures, while HBNK is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, RIT features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, RIT has returned 11.16% year-to-date with -$19 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 29.48% with -$429 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

024681012%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 19, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RIT
+5.33%+9.93%+11.16%+14.59%+33.03%
HBNK
+11.27%+28.71%+29.48%+73.16%-
Flows
RIT
-$5 M-$11 M-$19 M-$51 M-$183 M
HBNK
+$4 M-$179 M-$429 M-$680 M-

RIT vs HBNK exposure

Countries

RIT
Canada
97.74%
HBNK
Canada
99.93%

Sectors

RIT
Real Estate
80.41%
Health Care
9.79%
Other
9.79%
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 19, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RIT
RIOCAN REAL ESTATE UNT
7.26%
CA3874372053
6.92%
DREAM INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE
6.82%
FIRST CAPITAL REIT UNT
5.80%
CHARTWELL RETIREMENT RESIDENCES
5.72%
CROMBIE REI UNT
5.50%
BOARDWALK REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT UNT
4.92%
H&R REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST UNIT
4.83%
PRIMARIS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST UNIT
4.75%
KILLAM APARTMENT REAL ESTATE
4.65%
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%

Diversification

RIT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 29 total
57.17%
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%

Characteristics

Compare
RIT
HBNK
ProviderCIGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield4.44%2.58%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 12, 2004July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about RIT and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RIT or HBNK?
As of June 19, 2026, RIT has returned 11.16% year to date, while HBNK has returned 29.48%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RIT or HBNK?
As of June 19, 2026, RIT manages $432.79 M in assets, while HBNK manages $803.00 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RIT and HBNK managed?
RIT is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do RIT and HBNK emphasize?
RIT is most exposed to Real Estate and Health Care. HBNK is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RIT or HBNK?
Year to date, RIT has seen -$19.42 M in net flows, compared with -$429.10 M for HBNK. RIT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RIT and HBNK compare?
RIT has an expense ratio of 0.87%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of RIT and HBNK?
RIT's largest holdings include RIOCAN REAL ESTATE UNT and DREAM INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE. HBNK's top holdings include CDN IMPERIAL BK, TORONTO DOMINION, and NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: RIT or HBNK?
RIT holds 26 securities, while HBNK holds 6. On holdings count, RIT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about RIT and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds