Compare CI First Asset Canadian REIT ETF (RIT) vs BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. RIT provides Real Estate and Health Care exposures, while ZUT is primarily weighted in Utilities. When evaluating costs, RIT features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, RIT has returned 11.16% year-to-date with -$19 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 20.15% with -$123 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
| AuM | $432.79 M | $844.73 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.87% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.90% |
Historical performance and flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RIT | +5.33% | +9.93% | +11.16% | +14.59% | +33.03% |
ZUT | +3.37% | +8.11% | +20.15% | +28.32% | +51.67% | |
| Flows | RIT | -$5 M | -$11 M | -$19 M | -$51 M | -$183 M |
ZUT | -$58 M | -$42 M | -$123 M | +$24 M | +$184 M |
RIT vs ZUT exposure
Countries
Sectors
Top 10 Holdings
Diversification
Characteristics
| Provider | CI | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.44% | 2.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 12, 2004 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about RIT and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RIT or ZUT?
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RIT or ZUT?
How are RIT and ZUT managed?
What sectors do RIT and ZUT emphasize?
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RIT or ZUT?
How do the fees of RIT and ZUT compare?
What are the top holdings of RIT and ZUT?
Which ETF is more diversified: RIT or ZUT?
Recent articles about RIT and ZUT

Build Canada Homes: A Boost for Real Estate ETFs?
The Canadian government's $26B prefab housing plan and a U.S. tariff ruling have injected optimism into real estate markets, with analysts anticipating gains for REITs and construction-focused funds.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.




