RPLS
RBC Core Plus Bond Pool ETF

Full RPLS fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, RPLS features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, RPLS has returned 1.64% year-to-date with +$148 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 11.05% with +$560 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RPLS
+1.07%+1.85%+1.64%+4.92%-
ZSP
+2.61%+14.55%+11.05%+27.54%+85.01%
Flows
RPLS
+$14 M+$8 M+$148 M+$282 M-
ZSP
+$67 M+$273 M+$560 M+$1,490 M+$5,073 M

RPLS vs ZSP exposure

Countries

RPLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.06%

Sectors

RPLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
36.41%
Communication Services
10.68%
Consumer Discretionary
10.06%
Financials
9.94%
Health Care
8.26%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
16.63%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RPLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
8.33%
APPLE
6.50%
MICROSOFT-T
5.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.21%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.33%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.16%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.67%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
TESLA
1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.44%

Diversification

RPLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.91%

Characteristics

Compare
RPLS
ZSP
ProviderRBC Global Asset ManagementBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield4.18%0.76%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 20, 2024November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about RPLS and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RPLS or ZSP?
As of June 12, 2026, RPLS has returned 1.64% year to date, while ZSP has returned 11.05%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RPLS or ZSP?
As of June 12, 2026, RPLS manages $433.31 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.94 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RPLS and ZSP managed?
RPLS is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RPLS or ZSP?
Year to date, RPLS has seen +$147.94 M in net flows, compared with +$559.91 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RPLS and ZSP compare?
RPLS has an expense ratio of 0.49%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about RPLS and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds