VS
When evaluating costs, SBT features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, SBT has returned 15.11% year-to-date with +$19 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 30.27% with -$484 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SBT
HBNK
| AuM | $62.26 M | $749.76 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SBT | -3.00% | -12.36% | -15.11% | +43.36% | +155.24% |
HBNK | -4.54% | +3.63% | +30.27% | +49.73% | +154.99% | |
| Flows | SBT | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$19 M | +$35 M | +$46 M |
HBNK | +$35 M | -$69 M | -$484 M | -$672 M | -$81 M |
SBT vs HBNK exposure
Countries
SBT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%
Sectors
SBT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SBT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%
Diversification
SBT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%
Characteristics
Compare
SBT
HBNK
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.64% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 28, 2009 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about SBT and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SBT or HBNK?
As of September 14, 2026, SBT has returned -15.11% year to date, while HBNK has returned 30.27%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SBT or HBNK?
As of September 14, 2026, SBT manages $62.26 M in assets, while HBNK manages $749.76 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SBT and HBNK managed?
SBT is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the LBMA Silver Price - Price/USD - USD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SBT or HBNK?
Year to date, SBT has seen +$19.38 M in net flows, compared with -$483.52 M for HBNK. SBT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SBT and HBNK compare?
SBT has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about SBT and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.