VS
When evaluating costs, SBUL features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, SBUL has returned 18.71% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 28.23% with +$29 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SBUL
HEWB
| AuM | $0.91 M | $340.04 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.85% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.70% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SBUL | -13.04% | +1.20% | -18.71% | +8.27% | - |
HEWB | -3.83% | -3.29% | +28.23% | +42.92% | +168.60% | |
| Flows | SBUL | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$1 M | - |
HEWB | -$3 M | +$6 M | +$29 M | +$28 M | +$33 M |
SBUL vs HEWB exposure
Countries
SBUL
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
SBUL
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SBUL
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.59%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.16%
Bank of Montreal
16.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
SBUL
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
SBUL
HEWB
| Provider | Ninepoint Partners | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 16, 2025 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about SBUL and HEWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SBUL or HEWB?
As of October 19, 2026, SBUL has returned -18.71% year to date, while HEWB has returned 28.23%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SBUL or HEWB?
As of October 19, 2026, SBUL manages $0.91 M in assets, while HEWB manages $340.04 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SBUL and HEWB managed?
SBUL is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SBUL or HEWB?
Year to date, SBUL has seen -$0.90 M in net flows, compared with +$29.05 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SBUL and HEWB compare?
SBUL has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about SBUL and HEWB
Oil ETFs Rally as Gold and Silver Retreat in Volatile Week
Canadian energy ETFs rallied alongside oil prices last week as sanctions on Russia tightened global supply expectations, while precious metals corrected sharply following record highs and easing safe-haven demand.
Posted on 10/27/2025 by Edouard Caillieux inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.