VS
When evaluating costs, SCGI features a management fee (MER) of 0.9%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, SCGI has returned 19.19% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.36% with +$425 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SCGI
ZEB
| AuM | $4.85 M | $7,427.67 M |
| Management Fees | 0.90% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.25% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.54% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCGI | -2.05% | -2.35% | +19.19% | +24.30% | +60.42% |
ZEB | -0.32% | +11.06% | +32.36% | +55.47% | +161.28% | |
| Flows | SCGI | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$8 M |
ZEB | +$377 M | +$1,600 M | +$425 M | +$761 M | -$338 M |
SCGI vs ZEB exposure
Countries
SCGI
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
SCGI
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SCGI
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
SCGI
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
SCGI
ZEB
| Provider | Starlight Capital | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.26% | 2.31% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 2, 2018 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about SCGI and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SCGI or ZEB?
As of September 3, 2026, SCGI has returned 19.19% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.36%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SCGI or ZEB?
As of September 3, 2026, SCGI manages $4.85 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.43 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SCGI and ZEB managed?
SCGI is actively managed by Starlight Capital. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SCGI or ZEB?
Year to date, SCGI has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$425.30 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SCGI and ZEB compare?
SCGI has an expense ratio of 1.25%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about SCGI and ZEB
SCGI ETF: A Defensive, High-Income Play on the $15T Infrastructure Gap
This fund offers a diversified, income-focused solution for investors to capitalize on the growing multi-trillion dollar global infrastructure gap, with a timely emphasis on energy and utilities.
Posted on 9/9/2025 by Kyle Anthony inInfrastructure
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.