VS
When evaluating costs, SLGC features a management fee (MER) of 0.43%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, SLGC has returned 2.4% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 28.49% with -$485 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SLGC
HBNK
| AuM | $4.20 M | $736.86 M |
| Management Fees | 0.43% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.32% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SLGC | -0.82% | -1.84% | -2.40% | -3.01% | - |
HBNK | -3.80% | -3.19% | +28.49% | +43.29% | +170.31% | |
| Flows | SLGC | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$1 M | +$2 M | - |
HBNK | -$1 M | -$23 M | -$485 M | -$531 M | -$199 M |
SLGC vs HBNK exposure
Countries
SLGC
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.74%
Sectors
SLGC
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.74%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SLGC
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.48%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.21%
Bank of Montreal
16.52%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.70%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
SLGC
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.74%
Characteristics
Compare
SLGC
HBNK
| Provider | Sun Life Global Investments | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.82% | 2.70% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 21, 2025 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about SLGC and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SLGC or HBNK?
As of October 19, 2026, SLGC has returned -2.40% year to date, while HBNK has returned 28.49%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SLGC or HBNK?
As of October 19, 2026, SLGC manages $4.20 M in assets, while HBNK manages $736.86 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SLGC and HBNK managed?
SLGC is actively managed by Sun Life Global Investments. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SLGC or HBNK?
Year to date, SLGC has seen -$0.51 M in net flows, compared with -$484.51 M for HBNK. SLGC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SLGC and HBNK compare?
SLGC has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about SLGC and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.