SOLL
Purpose Solana ETF

Full SOLL fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, SOLL features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, SOLL has returned 16.99% year-to-date with -$12 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 32.46% with -$509 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

01020304050%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 3, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
SOLL
+41.04%+44.74%-16.99%-51.30%-
HBNK
-0.30%+11.09%+32.46%+55.67%+162.45%
Flows
SOLL
-$0 M+$1 M-$12 M+$14 M-
HBNK
+$7 M-$91 M-$509 M-$686 M-$82 M

SOLL vs HBNK exposure

Countries

SOLL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%

Sectors

SOLL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 3, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

SOLL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%

Diversification

SOLL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%

Characteristics

Compare
SOLL
HBNK
ProviderPurpose InvestmentsGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCompass 3.45pm - 4pm NY TWAP Solana Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassCryptocurrenciesEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.59%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 11, 2025July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about SOLL and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: SOLL or HBNK?
As of September 3, 2026, SOLL has returned -16.99% year to date, while HBNK has returned 32.46%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SOLL or HBNK?
As of September 3, 2026, SOLL manages $30.56 M in assets, while HBNK manages $736.43 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SOLL and HBNK managed?
SOLL is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the Compass 3.45pm - 4pm NY TWAP Solana Index - USD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SOLL or HBNK?
Year to date, SOLL has seen -$12.02 M in net flows, compared with -$509.07 M for HBNK. SOLL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SOLL and HBNK compare?
SOLL has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about SOLL and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds