VS
When evaluating costs, TCSH features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, TCSH has returned 1.51% year-to-date with +$823 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 29.88% with -$482 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TCSH
HBNK
| AuM | $1,333.33 M | $748.64 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.16% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TCSH | +0.16% | +0.56% | +1.51% | +2.08% | - |
HBNK | -4.69% | +2.40% | +29.88% | +48.43% | +153.45% | |
| Flows | TCSH | +$66 M | +$247 M | +$823 M | +$922 M | - |
HBNK | +$34 M | -$65 M | -$482 M | -$592 M | -$92 M |
TCSH vs HBNK exposure
Countries
TCSH
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%
Sectors
TCSH
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TCSH
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%
Diversification
TCSH
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%
Characteristics
Compare
TCSH
HBNK
| Provider | TD Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.14% | 2.65% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 27, 2024 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about TCSH and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TCSH or HBNK?
As of September 16, 2026, TCSH has returned 1.51% year to date, while HBNK has returned 29.88%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TCSH or HBNK?
As of September 16, 2026, TCSH manages $1.33 B in assets, while HBNK manages $748.64 M. TCSH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TCSH and HBNK managed?
TCSH is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TCSH or HBNK?
Year to date, TCSH has seen +$822.60 M in net flows, compared with -$482.41 M for HBNK. TCSH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TCSH and HBNK compare?
TCSH has an expense ratio of 0.16%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about TCSH and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.