VS
When evaluating costs, TCWW features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TCWW
HBNK
| AuM | $2.81 M | $724.28 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.85% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.93% | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TCWW | +0.03% | +9.16% | - | - | - |
HBNK | -1.80% | +8.93% | +30.47% | +54.80% | +158.51% | |
| Flows | TCWW | +$0 M | -$0 M | - | - | - |
HBNK | +$6 M | -$93 M | -$510 M | -$680 M | -$83 M |
TCWW vs HBNK exposure
Countries
TCWW
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%
Sectors
TCWW
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TCWW
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%
Diversification
TCWW
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%
Characteristics
Compare
TCWW
HBNK
| Provider | LongPoint Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive TC Quant WW 50 Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.63% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 10, 2026 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about TCWW and HBNK
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TCWW or HBNK?
As of September 2, 2026, TCWW manages $2.81 M in assets, while HBNK manages $724.28 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TCWW and HBNK managed?
TCWW is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive TC Quant WW 50 Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of TCWW and HBNK compare?
TCWW has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about TCWW and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.