VS
TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC) and Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TDOC focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology, while HIG leans towards Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, TDOC features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.75% for HIG. Performance-wise, TDOC has returned 2.82% year-to-date with +$30 M in net flows, whereas HIG is at 6.2% with +$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TDOC
HIG
| AuM | $121.85 M | $62.58 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.42% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TDOC | +5.37% | -0.48% | -2.82% | +6.68% | +15.93% |
HIG | +4.08% | -6.76% | -6.20% | +3.35% | +6.17% | |
| Flows | TDOC | +$15 M | +$21 M | +$30 M | +$39 M | +$72 M |
HIG | +$1 M | +$4 M | +$8 M | +$13 M | +$16 M |
TDOC vs HIG exposure
Countries
TDOC
USA
61.08%
Japan
7.94%
Other
30.98%
HIG
USA
77.90%
Other
16.60%
Sectors
TDOC
Health Care
89.63%
Other
9.16%
HIG
Health Care
77.20%
Other
20.60%
As of June 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TDOC
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.36%
GSK PLC
2.32%
PFIZER
2.31%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
2.26%
GILEAD SCIENCES
2.23%
NOVARTIS
2.22%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
2.22%
MERCK & CO INC
2.21%
MCKESSON
2.19%
AMGEN-T
2.17%
HIG
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
6.70%
LILLY
5.20%
GILEAD SCIENCES
5.20%
CARDINAL HEALTH
4.80%
HCA HEALTHCARE
4.80%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
4.80%
MCKESSON
4.40%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS
4.10%
AMGEN-T
4.00%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL
4.00%
Diversification
TDOC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 102 total
22.49%
HIG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21 total
48.00%
Characteristics
Compare
TDOC
HIG
| Provider | TD Asset Management | Brompton Group |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.18% | 9.21% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 14, 2021 | September 24, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about TDOC and HIG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TDOC or HIG?
As of June 10, 2026, TDOC has returned -2.82% year to date, while HIG has returned -6.20%. TDOC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TDOC or HIG?
As of June 10, 2026, TDOC manages $121.85 M in assets, while HIG manages $62.58 M. TDOC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TDOC and HIG managed?
TDOC is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD benchmark. HIG is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TDOC and HIG emphasize?
TDOC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology. HIG is most exposed to Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TDOC or HIG?
Year to date, TDOC has seen +$29.96 M in net flows, compared with +$8.07 M for HIG. TDOC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TDOC and HIG compare?
TDOC has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HIG has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
What are the top holdings of TDOC and HIG?
TDOC's largest holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON and GSK PLC. HIG's top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, LILLY, and GILEAD SCIENCES.
Which ETF is more diversified: TDOC or HIG?
TDOC holds 99 securities, while HIG holds 21. On holdings count, TDOC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TDOC and HIG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.