VS
Compare TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC) vs TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. TDOC and TDOC.U provide the same top sector exposures: Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, TDOC features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.35% for TDOC.U. Performance-wise, TDOC has returned 2.82% year-to-date with +$30 M in net flows, whereas TDOC.U is at 4.97% with -$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TDOC
TDOC.U
| AuM | $121.85 M | $2.06 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.42% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TDOC | +5.37% | -0.48% | -2.82% | +6.68% | +15.93% |
TDOC.U | +2.77% | -3.43% | -4.97% | +4.04% | +10.58% | |
| Flows | TDOC | +$15 M | +$21 M | +$30 M | +$39 M | +$72 M |
TDOC.U | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M |
TDOC vs TDOC.U exposure
Countries
TDOC
USA
61.08%
Japan
7.94%
Other
30.98%
TDOC.U
USA
61.08%
Japan
7.94%
Other
30.98%
Sectors
TDOC
Health Care
89.63%
Other
9.16%
TDOC.U
Health Care
89.63%
Other
9.16%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TDOC
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.36%
GSK PLC
2.32%
PFIZER
2.31%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
2.26%
GILEAD SCIENCES
2.23%
NOVARTIS
2.22%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
2.22%
MERCK & CO INC
2.21%
MCKESSON
2.19%
AMGEN-T
2.17%
TDOC.U
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.36%
GSK PLC
2.32%
PFIZER
2.31%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
2.26%
GILEAD SCIENCES
2.23%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
2.22%
NOVARTIS
2.22%
MERCK & CO INC
2.21%
MCKESSON
2.19%
AMGEN-T
2.17%
Diversification
TDOC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 102 total
22.49%
TDOC.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 102 total
22.49%
Characteristics
Compare
TDOC
TDOC.U
| Provider | TD Asset Management | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD | Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.18% | 1.27% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 14, 2021 | February 24, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about TDOC and TDOC.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TDOC or TDOC.U?
As of June 11, 2026, TDOC has returned -2.82% year to date, while TDOC.U has returned -4.97%. TDOC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TDOC or TDOC.U?
As of June 11, 2026, TDOC manages $121.85 M in assets, while TDOC.U manages $2.06 M. TDOC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TDOC and TDOC.U managed?
TDOC is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD benchmark. TDOC.U is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do TDOC and TDOC.U emphasize?
TDOC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology. TDOC.U is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TDOC or TDOC.U?
Year to date, TDOC has seen +$29.96 M in net flows, compared with -$0.02 M for TDOC.U. TDOC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TDOC and TDOC.U compare?
TDOC has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while TDOC.U has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of TDOC and TDOC.U?
TDOC's largest holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON and GSK PLC. TDOC.U's top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON and GSK PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: TDOC or TDOC.U?
TDOC holds 99 securities, while TDOC.U holds 99. On holdings count, TDOC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TDOC and TDOC.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.