VS
Compare TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC) vs iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (XHC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. TDOC provides Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology exposures, while XHC is primarily weighted in Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. When evaluating costs, TDOC features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.63% for XHC. Performance-wise, TDOC has returned 2.82% year-to-date with +$30 M in net flows, whereas XHC is at 1.14% with -$63 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TDOC
XHC
| AuM | $121.85 M | $491.71 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.63% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.42% | -0.63% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TDOC | +5.37% | -0.48% | -2.82% | +6.68% | +15.93% |
XHC | +6.47% | +0.19% | -1.14% | +10.26% | +13.40% | |
| Flows | TDOC | +$15 M | +$21 M | +$30 M | +$39 M | +$72 M |
XHC | -$20 M | -$45 M | -$63 M | -$27 M | -$110 M |
TDOC vs XHC exposure
Countries
TDOC
USA
61.08%
Japan
7.94%
Other
30.98%
XHC
USA
68.08%
Switzerland
10.40%
Other
21.52%
Sectors
TDOC
Health Care
89.63%
Other
9.16%
XHC
Health Care
89.82%
Other
8.80%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TDOC
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.36%
GSK PLC
2.32%
PFIZER
2.31%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
2.26%
GILEAD SCIENCES
2.23%
NOVARTIS
2.22%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
2.22%
MERCK & CO INC
2.21%
MCKESSON
2.19%
AMGEN-T
2.17%
XHC
LILLY
9.68%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
7.24%
ABBVIE
4.88%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
4.49%
ASTRAZENECA
3.93%
CH1499059983
3.82%
NOVARTIS
3.77%
MERCK & CO INC
3.62%
AMGEN-T
2.49%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
2.41%
Diversification
TDOC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 102 total
22.49%
XHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 113 total
46.33%
Characteristics
Compare
TDOC
XHC
| Provider | TD Asset Management | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD | S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.18% | 1.90% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 14, 2021 | April 12, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about TDOC and XHC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TDOC or XHC?
As of June 11, 2026, TDOC has returned -2.82% year to date, while XHC has returned -1.14%. XHC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TDOC or XHC?
As of June 11, 2026, TDOC manages $121.85 M in assets, while XHC manages $491.71 M. XHC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TDOC and XHC managed?
TDOC is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD benchmark. XHC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do TDOC and XHC emphasize?
TDOC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology. XHC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TDOC or XHC?
Year to date, TDOC has seen +$29.96 M in net flows, compared with -$63.06 M for XHC. TDOC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TDOC and XHC compare?
TDOC has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XHC has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of TDOC and XHC?
TDOC's largest holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON and GSK PLC. XHC's top holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: TDOC or XHC?
TDOC holds 99 securities, while XHC holds 102. On holdings count, XHC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TDOC and XHC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.