TECH
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF

Full TECH fund page
VS
ZQQ
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF

Full ZQQ fund page

Compare Evolve FANGMA Index ETF (TECH) vs BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZQQ) to find the best fit for your portfolio. TECH provides Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while ZQQ is primarily weighted in Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, TECH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.35% for ZQQ. Performance-wise, TECH has returned 4.41% year-to-date with +$20 M in net flows, whereas ZQQ is at 14.7% with -$115 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
TECH
+1.37%+8.31%+4.41%+5.55%+91.64%
ZQQ
-0.65%-0.60%+14.70%+20.20%+82.44%
Flows
TECH
-$2 M-$3 M+$20 M+$26 M+$9 M
ZQQ
+$30 M-$79 M-$115 M-$122 M+$112 M

TECH vs ZQQ exposure

Countries

TECH
USA
99.75%
ZQQ
USA
94.36%

Sectors

TECH
Technology
81.93%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
17.82%
ZQQ
Technology
67.71%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.04%
Other
20.25%
As of September 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

TECH
Microsoft Corp.
19.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
17.82%
Netflix, Inc.
17.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
16.75%
Apple, Inc.
15.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
14.06%
ZQQ
Apple, Inc.
8.17%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.87%
Microsoft Corp.
5.59%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.54%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.23%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
3.07%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.66%

Diversification

TECH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.75%
ZQQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
46.05%

Characteristics

Compare
TECH
ZQQ
ProviderEvolve ETFsBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CADNASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.08%0.23%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 6, 2021January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about TECH and ZQQ

Which ETF has performed better year to date: TECH or ZQQ?
As of September 11, 2026, TECH has returned 4.41% year to date, while ZQQ has returned 14.70%. ZQQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TECH or ZQQ?
As of September 11, 2026, TECH manages $129.36 M in assets, while ZQQ manages $3.08 B. ZQQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TECH and ZQQ managed?
TECH is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index - CAD benchmark. ZQQ is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do TECH and ZQQ emphasize?
TECH is most exposed to Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZQQ is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TECH or ZQQ?
Year to date, TECH has seen +$20.01 M in net flows, compared with -$114.58 M for ZQQ. TECH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TECH and ZQQ compare?
TECH has an expense ratio of 0.62%, while ZQQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of TECH and ZQQ?
TECH's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com, Inc., and Netflix, Inc.. ZQQ's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TECH or ZQQ?
TECH holds 6 securities, while ZQQ holds 102. On holdings count, ZQQ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about TECH and ZQQ

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds