VS
When evaluating costs, TINF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 1.5% for NNRG.U. Performance-wise, TINF has returned 11.53% year-to-date with +$116 M in net flows, whereas NNRG.U is at 40.14% with +$47 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TINF
NNRG.U
| AuM | $415.36 M | $317.73 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 1.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 1.79% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TINF | +0.85% | +3.04% | +11.53% | +16.25% | +60.95% |
NNRG.U | -0.50% | +12.72% | +40.14% | +57.18% | +94.98% | |
| Flows | TINF | +$21 M | +$68 M | +$116 M | +$208 M | +$239 M |
NNRG.U | +$9 M | +$39 M | +$47 M | +$11 M | -$136 M |
TINF vs NNRG.U exposure
Countries
TINF
USA
43.82%
Other
15.38%
Canada
7.47%
Other
33.33%
NNRG.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
TINF
Utilities
34.20%
Other
22.22%
Industrials
22.14%
Energy
21.44%
NNRG.U
Exposure data will be available soon
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TINF
AENA SME
5.53%
NEXTERA ENERGY
5.47%
WILLIAMS
4.49%
ENBRIDGE
4.09%
SOUTHERN
3.75%
ENEL GLOBAL TRADING
3.50%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.38%
US4005061019
3.23%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
3.22%
FLUGHAFEN ZUERICH AG KLOTEN COMMON SHARES
3.14%
NNRG.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
TINF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
39.80%
NNRG.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
TINF
NNRG.U
| Provider | TD Asset Management | Ninepoint Partners |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.96% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 2, 2020 | February 25, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about TINF and NNRG.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TINF or NNRG.U?
As of June 11, 2026, TINF has returned 11.53% year to date, while NNRG.U has returned 40.14%. NNRG.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TINF or NNRG.U?
As of June 11, 2026, TINF manages $415.36 M in assets, while NNRG.U manages $317.73 M. TINF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TINF and NNRG.U managed?
TINF is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. NNRG.U is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TINF or NNRG.U?
Year to date, TINF has seen +$116.10 M in net flows, compared with +$47.13 M for NNRG.U. TINF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TINF and NNRG.U compare?
TINF has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while NNRG.U has an expense ratio of 1.79%.
Recent articles about TINF and NNRG.U
Oil ETFs Rally as Gold and Silver Retreat in Volatile Week
Canadian energy ETFs rallied alongside oil prices last week as sanctions on Russia tightened global supply expectations, while precious metals corrected sharply following record highs and easing safe-haven demand.
Posted on 10/27/2025 by ETF Market Canada inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.