VS
When evaluating costs, TQQQ features a management fee (MER) of 1.15%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, TQQQ has returned 25.98% year-to-date with +$13 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 29.41% with -$487 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TQQQ
HBNK
| AuM | $120.66 M | $739.96 M |
| Management Fees | 1.15% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.15% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.32% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TQQQ | +0.45% | -4.31% | +25.98% | +29.24% | - |
HBNK | -0.36% | -5.02% | +29.41% | +45.24% | +166.14% | |
| Flows | TQQQ | -$15 M | -$4 M | +$13 M | +$34 M | - |
HBNK | -$4 M | -$24 M | -$487 M | -$533 M | -$189 M |
TQQQ vs HBNK exposure
Countries
TQQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.74%
Sectors
TQQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.74%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TQQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.48%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.21%
Bank of Montreal
16.52%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.70%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
TQQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.74%
Characteristics
Compare
TQQQ
HBNK
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.68% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 16, 2025 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about TQQQ and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TQQQ or HBNK?
As of October 16, 2026, TQQQ has returned 25.98% year to date, while HBNK has returned 29.41%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TQQQ or HBNK?
As of October 16, 2026, TQQQ manages $120.66 M in assets, while HBNK manages $739.96 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TQQQ and HBNK managed?
TQQQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TQQQ or HBNK?
Year to date, TQQQ has seen +$12.97 M in net flows, compared with -$486.68 M for HBNK. TQQQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TQQQ and HBNK compare?
TQQQ has an expense ratio of 1.15%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about TQQQ and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.