VS
When evaluating costs, TSLY features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, TSLY has returned 13.41% year-to-date with +$66 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 15.32% with -$60 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TSLY
ZUT
| AuM | $250.06 M | $873.00 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.88% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.85% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 1, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TSLY | +0.52% | -7.79% | -13.41% | +47.83% | - |
ZUT | -0.63% | +12.47% | +15.32% | +28.73% | +38.60% | |
| Flows | TSLY | +$14 M | +$43 M | +$66 M | +$204 M | - |
ZUT | +$25 M | -$37 M | -$60 M | +$129 M | +$254 M |
TSLY vs ZUT exposure
Countries
TSLY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%
Sectors
TSLY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of May 1, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TSLY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%
Diversification
TSLY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%
Characteristics
Compare
TSLY
ZUT
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 41.74% | 2.91% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 16, 2025 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about TSLY and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TSLY or ZUT?
As of May 1, 2026, TSLY has returned -13.41% year to date, while ZUT has returned 15.32%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TSLY or ZUT?
As of May 1, 2026, TSLY manages $250.06 M in assets, while ZUT manages $873.00 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TSLY and ZUT managed?
TSLY is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TSLY or ZUT?
Year to date, TSLY has seen +$65.77 M in net flows, compared with -$60.16 M for ZUT. TSLY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TSLY and ZUT compare?
TSLY has an expense ratio of 1.88%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about TSLY and ZUT
Tesla ETFs Plunge as EV Funds Show Resilience Amid Stock Rout
Tesla’s sharp stock decline is hitting TSLA-focused ETFs hard, with year-to-date losses exceeding 40%. Meanwhile, diversified EV and Future Mobility ETFs are proving more resilient, highlighting shifting investor sentiment.
Posted on 3/17/2025 by ETF Market Canada inTechnology
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.