UMAX
Hamilton Utilities Yield Maximizer ETF

Full UMAX fund page
VS
ZUH
BMO Equal Weight U.S. Health Care Index ETF

Full ZUH fund page

Hamilton Utilities Yield Maximizer ETF (UMAX) and BMO Equal Weight U.S. Health Care Index ETF (ZUH) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that UMAX focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services, while ZUH leans towards Health Care. When evaluating costs, UMAX features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.35% for ZUH. Performance-wise, UMAX has returned 4.68% year-to-date with +$246 M in net flows, whereas ZUH is at 4.55% with -$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.0%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
UMAX
-0.30%+3.66%+4.68%+12.73%-
ZUH
+1.55%-7.61%-4.55%+7.21%-7.29%
Flows
UMAX
+$102 M+$216 M+$246 M+$648 M-
ZUH
+$0 M-$7 M-$7 M-$42 M-$205 M

UMAX vs ZUH exposure

Countries

UMAX
Canada
93.80%
Bermuda
7.60%
ZUH
USA
96.03%

Sectors

UMAX
Utilities
31.30%
Energy
24.50%
Communication Services
22.90%
Industrials
22.70%
ZUH
Health Care
93.49%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

UMAX
PEMBINA PIPELINE
8.20%
ENBRIDGE
8.20%
TC ENERGY CORP
8.10%
HYDRO ONE
8.00%
EMERA
7.90%
BCE
7.80%
FORTIS
7.80%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS
7.80%
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
7.70%
BROOKFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LP UNIT
7.60%
ZUH
UTD THERAPEUT
1.65%
US86627T1088
1.51%
INSMED
1.46%
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA
1.42%
METTLER TOLEDO
1.40%
PFIZER
1.38%
ROYALTY PHARMA
1.37%
MERCK & CO INC
1.37%
BIOGEN INC
1.36%
DAVITA INC
1.36%

Diversification

UMAX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.10%
ZUH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 80 total
14.29%

Characteristics

Compare
UMAX
ZUH
ProviderHamilton ETFsBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight US Health Care Canadian Dollar Hedged Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield14.43%0.57%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 14, 2023May 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about UMAX and ZUH

Which ETF has performed better year to date: UMAX or ZUH?
As of April 24, 2026, UMAX has returned 4.68% year to date, while ZUH has returned -4.55%. UMAX is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: UMAX or ZUH?
As of April 24, 2026, UMAX manages $1.29 B in assets, while ZUH manages $166.90 M. UMAX is the larger fund by AUM.
How are UMAX and ZUH managed?
UMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index. ZUH is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight US Health Care Canadian Dollar Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do UMAX and ZUH emphasize?
UMAX is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services. ZUH is most exposed to Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: UMAX or ZUH?
Year to date, UMAX has seen +$246.02 M in net flows, compared with -$6.83 M for ZUH. UMAX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of UMAX and ZUH compare?
UMAX has an expense ratio of 0.79%, while ZUH has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of UMAX and ZUH?
UMAX's largest holdings include PEMBINA PIPELINE, ENBRIDGE, and TC ENERGY CORP. ZUH's top holdings include UTD THERAPEUT and INSMED.
Which ETF is more diversified: UMAX or ZUH?
UMAX holds 13 securities, while ZUH holds 74. On holdings count, ZUH is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about UMAX and ZUH

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds