VS
Compare CI U.S. MidCap Dividend Index ETF (UMI) vs BMO S&P US Mid Cap Index ETF (ZMID) to find the best fit for your portfolio. UMI and ZMID provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, UMI features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.15% for ZMID. Performance-wise, UMI has returned 11.78% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas ZMID is at 15.08% with -$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
UMI
ZMID
| AuM | $7.05 M | $310.21 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.16% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.40% | 0.23% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UMI | -1.87% | +4.56% | +11.78% | +10.28% | +38.06% |
ZMID | -4.61% | +0.11% | +15.08% | +17.37% | +50.80% | |
| Flows | UMI | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$2 M | -$2 M | -$12 M |
ZMID | +$6 M | -$14 M | -$12 M | -$15 M | -$30 M |
UMI vs ZMID exposure
Countries
UMI
USA
81.62%
Other
18.38%
ZMID
USA
96.49%
Sectors
UMI
Finance
22.84%
Other
18.38%
Industrials
18.21%
Technology
12.92%
Non-Energy Materials
8.59%
Other
19.07%
ZMID
Finance
23.17%
Industrials
16.94%
Technology
13.46%
Non-Energy Materials
10.25%
Healthcare
10.24%
Other
25.94%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
UMI
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
6.74%
Thor Industries, Inc.
3.21%
Agree Realty Corp.
3.14%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
3.10%
Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc.
3.03%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
2.63%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
2.63%
Bentley Systems, Inc.
2.59%
KBR, Inc.
2.45%
The Ensign Group, Inc.
2.08%
ZMID
Illumina, Inc.
0.87%
Twilio, Inc.
0.81%
TechnipFMC plc
0.77%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.75%
ATI, Inc.
0.70%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.70%
Everpure, Inc.
0.67%
Okta, Inc.
0.66%
nVent Electric Plc
0.66%
XPO, Inc.
0.66%
Diversification
UMI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 294 total
31.61%
ZMID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 400 total
7.25%
Characteristics
Compare
UMI
ZMID
| Provider | CI | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Index Net Total Return - CAD-Hedged | S&P MidCap 400 Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.32% | 0.92% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 19, 2017 | February 11, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about UMI and ZMID
Which ETF has performed better year to date: UMI or ZMID?
As of September 2, 2026, UMI has returned 11.78% year to date, while ZMID has returned 15.08%. ZMID is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: UMI or ZMID?
As of September 2, 2026, UMI manages $7.05 M in assets, while ZMID manages $310.21 M. ZMID is the larger fund by AUM.
How are UMI and ZMID managed?
UMI is passively managed by CI. It tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Index Net Total Return - CAD-Hedged benchmark. ZMID is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do UMI and ZMID emphasize?
UMI is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. ZMID is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: UMI or ZMID?
Year to date, UMI has seen -$1.70 M in net flows, compared with -$12.14 M for ZMID. UMI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of UMI and ZMID compare?
UMI has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while ZMID has an expense ratio of 0.16%.
What are the top holdings of UMI and ZMID?
UMI's largest holdings include Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Thor Industries, Inc., and Agree Realty Corp.. ZMID's top holdings include Illumina, Inc., Twilio, Inc., and TechnipFMC plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: UMI or ZMID?
UMI holds 292 securities, while ZMID holds 400. On holdings count, ZMID is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about UMI and ZMID
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.