VEQT
Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio

Full VEQT fund page
VS
CEQT
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF

Full CEQT fund page

Compare Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT) vs CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VEQT provides Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials exposures, while CEQT is primarily weighted in Financials, Information Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, VEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.22%, compared to 0.22% for CEQT. Performance-wise, VEQT has returned 6.31% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas CEQT is at 6.42% with +$14 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%Mar 27Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 27, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
VEQT
+8.61%+2.80%+6.31%+32.16%+73.19%
CEQT
+8.30%+2.48%+6.42%+31.87%-
Flows
VEQT
+$450 M+$1,665 M+$2,355 M+$4,448 M+$7,544 M
CEQT
+$2 M+$13 M+$14 M+$29 M-

VEQT vs CEQT exposure

Countries

VEQT
USA
41.93%
Canada
31.08%
Other
26.99%
CEQT
USA
33.99%
Canada
30.75%
Other
35.25%

Sectors

VEQT
Information Technology
19.46%
Financials
18.64%
Industrials
9.77%
Other
8.52%
Energy
8.46%
Consumer Discretionary
7.52%
Other
27.64%
CEQT
Financials
19.36%
Information Technology
18.19%
Industrials
10.36%
Energy
8.37%
Materials
7.87%
Other
7.79%
Other
28.07%
As of April 27, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

VEQT
NVIDIA
2.78%
APPLE
2.57%
ROYAL BK CANADA
2.13%
MICROSOFT-T
1.90%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.47%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.39%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.37%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.16%
ENBRIDGE
1.11%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.01%
CEQT
NVIDIA
2.36%
APPLE
2.12%
ROYAL BK CANADA
2.06%
MICROSOFT-T
1.58%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.43%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.27%
TWN SEMICONT MAN
1.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.15%
ENBRIDGE
1.07%
ALPHABET INC-CL
0.97%

Diversification

VEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12,196 total
16.89%
CEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6,555 total
15.18%

Characteristics

Compare
VEQT
CEQT
ProviderVanguardCI
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.33%0.96%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 5, 2019May 17, 2023

Frequently asked questions about VEQT and CEQT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: VEQT or CEQT?
As of April 27, 2026, VEQT has returned 6.31% year to date, while CEQT has returned 6.42%. CEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VEQT or CEQT?
As of April 27, 2026, VEQT manages $13.33 B in assets, while CEQT manages $42.56 M. VEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VEQT and CEQT managed?
VEQT is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index. CEQT is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do VEQT and CEQT emphasize?
VEQT is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. CEQT is most exposed to Financials, Information Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VEQT or CEQT?
Year to date, VEQT has seen +$2,354.82 M in net flows, compared with +$14.40 M for CEQT. VEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VEQT and CEQT compare?
VEQT has an expense ratio of 0.24%, while CEQT has an expense ratio of 0.29%.
What are the top holdings of VEQT and CEQT?
VEQT's largest holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE. CEQT's top holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: VEQT or CEQT?
VEQT holds 10736 securities, while CEQT holds 5958. On holdings count, VEQT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about VEQT and CEQT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds