VGRO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio

Full VGRO fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VGRO focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials, while ZUT leans towards Utilities. When evaluating costs, VGRO features a management fee (MER) of 0.22%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, VGRO has returned 7.62% year-to-date with +$780 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 15.78% with -$62 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22Apr 29May 6

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 8, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
VGRO
+3.91%+4.43%+7.62%+26.22%+65.67%
ZUT
-1.94%+10.98%+15.78%+28.82%+38.18%
Flows
VGRO
+$167 M+$498 M+$780 M+$1,494 M+$3,103 M
ZUT
+$25 M-$33 M-$62 M+$134 M+$311 M

VGRO vs ZUT exposure

Countries

VGRO
USA
37.67%
Canada
36.64%
Other
25.69%
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%

Sectors

VGRO
Information Technology
15.70%
Financials
15.07%
Other
10.99%
Industrials
7.93%
Other
50.30%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of May 8, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

VGRO
NVIDIA
2.25%
APPLE
2.08%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.71%
MICROSOFT-T
1.53%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.19%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.12%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.10%
ALPHABET INC-CL
0.93%
ENBRIDGE
0.89%
BROADCOM LIMITED
0.82%
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%

Diversification

VGRO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 33,350 total
13.63%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%

Characteristics

Compare
VGRO
ZUT
ProviderVanguardBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.75%2.90%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 1, 2018January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about VGRO and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: VGRO or ZUT?
As of May 8, 2026, VGRO has returned 7.62% year to date, while ZUT has returned 15.78%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VGRO or ZUT?
As of May 8, 2026, VGRO manages $9.84 B in assets, while ZUT manages $875.01 M. VGRO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VGRO and ZUT managed?
VGRO is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VGRO and ZUT emphasize?
VGRO is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VGRO or ZUT?
Year to date, VGRO has seen +$779.72 M in net flows, compared with -$61.61 M for ZUT. VGRO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VGRO and ZUT compare?
VGRO has an expense ratio of 0.24%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of VGRO and ZUT?
VGRO's largest holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS.
Which ETF is more diversified: VGRO or ZUT?
VGRO holds 24906 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, VGRO is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about VGRO and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds