VS
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN) and CI U.S. 1000 Index ETF (CUSM.B) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VUN focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary, while CUSM.B leans towards Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, VUN features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.16% for CUSM.B. Performance-wise, VUN has returned 4.78% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas CUSM.B is at 4.58% with +$27 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VUN
CUSM.B
| AuM | $16,765.88 M | $202.20 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.14% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VUN | +10.80% | +3.99% | +4.78% | +29.01% | +78.45% |
CUSM.B | +10.91% | +4.04% | +4.58% | +28.88% | +78.53% | |
| Flows | VUN | +$356 M | +$1,160 M | +$1,646 M | +$3,007 M | +$5,612 M |
CUSM.B | +$13 M | +$17 M | +$27 M | +$46 M | +$136 M |
VUN vs CUSM.B exposure
Countries
VUN
USA
95.73%
CUSM.B
USA
96.40%
Sectors
VUN
Information Technology
31.25%
Financials
10.49%
Consumer Discretionary
9.80%
Health Care
9.72%
Communication Services
9.26%
Industrials
9.26%
Other
20.21%
CUSM.B
Information Technology
32.12%
Financials
10.16%
Consumer Discretionary
10.12%
Communication Services
10.03%
Health Care
9.55%
Industrials
9.04%
Other
18.97%
As of April 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VUN
NVIDIA
6.37%
APPLE
5.90%
MICROSOFT-T
4.35%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.18%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.65%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.32%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.10%
META PLATFORMS
1.98%
TESLA
1.66%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.36%
CUSM.B
NVIDIA
6.75%
APPLE
6.06%
MICROSOFT-T
4.50%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.30%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.77%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.40%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.39%
META PLATFORMS
2.06%
TESLA
1.79%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.32%
Diversification
VUN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,420 total
31.87%
CUSM.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,007 total
33.34%
Characteristics
Compare
VUN
CUSM.B
| Provider | Vanguard | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.80% | 0.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 2, 2013 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about VUN and CUSM.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VUN or CUSM.B?
As of April 30, 2026, VUN has returned 4.78% year to date, while CUSM.B has returned 4.58%. VUN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VUN or CUSM.B?
As of April 30, 2026, VUN manages $16.77 B in assets, while CUSM.B manages $202.20 M. VUN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VUN and CUSM.B managed?
VUN is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. CUSM.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD benchmark.
What sectors do VUN and CUSM.B emphasize?
VUN is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary. CUSM.B is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VUN or CUSM.B?
Year to date, VUN has seen +$1,646.49 M in net flows, compared with +$26.88 M for CUSM.B. VUN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VUN and CUSM.B compare?
VUN has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while CUSM.B has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of VUN and CUSM.B?
VUN's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL. CUSM.B's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: VUN or CUSM.B?
VUN holds 2752 securities, while CUSM.B holds 908. On holdings count, VUN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VUN and CUSM.B
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.