VS
Compare Vanguard Morningstar U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN) vs Vanguard Morningstar U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VUN and VUS provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, VUN features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.15% for VUS. Performance-wise, VUN has returned 14.62% year-to-date with +$3 B in net flows, whereas VUS is at 10.72% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VUN
VUS
| AuM | $19,914.37 M | $1,420.64 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.13% | -0.12% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 18, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VUN | -0.30% | +0.64% | +14.62% | +17.34% | +82.36% |
VUS | -1.11% | +1.24% | +10.72% | +13.39% | +67.73% | |
| Flows | VUN | +$392 M | +$1,052 M | +$3,232 M | +$3,943 M | +$7,072 M |
VUS | +$0 M | -$0 M | +$2 M | -$3 M | +$109 M |
VUN vs VUS exposure
Countries
VUN
USA
97.06%
VUS
USA
97.06%
Sectors
VUN
Technology
41.21%
Finance
14.86%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Industrials
8.73%
Other
16.88%
VUS
Technology
41.21%
Finance
14.86%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Industrials
8.73%
Other
16.88%
As of September 18, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VUN
NVIDIA Corp.
6.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.28%
Microsoft Corp.
4.78%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.89%
Broadcom Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.69%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.30%
VUS
NVIDIA Corp.
6.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.28%
Microsoft Corp.
4.78%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.89%
Broadcom Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.69%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.30%
Diversification
VUN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,428 total
33.17%
VUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,428 total
33.17%
Characteristics
Compare
VUN
VUS
| Provider | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD | CRSP U.S. Total Market (CAD-hedged) Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.76% | 0.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 2, 2013 | November 30, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about VUN and VUS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VUN or VUS?
As of September 18, 2026, VUN has returned 14.62% year to date, while VUS has returned 10.72%. VUN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VUN or VUS?
As of September 18, 2026, VUN manages $19.91 B in assets, while VUS manages $1.42 B. VUN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VUN and VUS managed?
VUN is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. VUS is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the CRSP U.S. Total Market (CAD-hedged) Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VUN and VUS emphasize?
VUN is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. VUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VUN or VUS?
Year to date, VUN has seen +$3,232.03 M in net flows, compared with +$2.44 M for VUS. VUN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VUN and VUS compare?
VUN has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while VUS has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of VUN and VUS?
VUN's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. VUS's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: VUN or VUS?
VUN holds 3324 securities, while VUS holds 3324. On holdings count, VUN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VUN and VUS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.