VS
Compare Vanguard Morningstar U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUS) vs Vanguard Morningstar U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VUS and VUN provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, VUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.15% for VUN. Performance-wise, VUS has returned 9.52% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas VUN is at 13.33% with +$3 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VUS
VUN
| AuM | $1,403.85 M | $19,667.95 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.12% | -0.13% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VUS | -2.98% | +0.01% | +9.52% | +12.76% | +65.89% |
VUN | -2.05% | +0.38% | +13.33% | +17.06% | +80.31% | |
| Flows | VUS | -$1 M | -$1 M | +$1 M | -$5 M | +$107 M |
VUN | +$408 M | +$1,066 M | +$3,209 M | +$3,945 M | +$7,049 M |
VUS vs VUN exposure
Countries
VUS
USA
97.06%
VUN
USA
97.06%
Sectors
VUS
Technology
41.21%
Finance
14.86%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Industrials
8.73%
Other
16.88%
VUN
Technology
41.21%
Finance
14.86%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Industrials
8.73%
Other
16.88%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VUS
NVIDIA Corp.
6.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.28%
Microsoft Corp.
4.78%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.89%
Broadcom Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.69%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.30%
VUN
NVIDIA Corp.
6.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.28%
Microsoft Corp.
4.78%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.89%
Broadcom Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.69%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.30%
Diversification
VUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,428 total
33.17%
VUN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,428 total
33.17%
Characteristics
Compare
VUS
VUN
| Provider | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CRSP U.S. Total Market (CAD-hedged) Total Return Index - CAD | CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.78% | 0.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 30, 2011 | August 2, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about VUS and VUN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VUS or VUN?
As of September 16, 2026, VUS has returned 9.52% year to date, while VUN has returned 13.33%. VUN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VUS or VUN?
As of September 16, 2026, VUS manages $1.40 B in assets, while VUN manages $19.67 B. VUN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VUS and VUN managed?
VUS is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the CRSP U.S. Total Market (CAD-hedged) Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. VUN is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VUS and VUN emphasize?
VUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. VUN is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VUS or VUN?
Year to date, VUS has seen +$1.16 M in net flows, compared with +$3,209.21 M for VUN. VUN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VUS and VUN compare?
VUS has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while VUN has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of VUS and VUN?
VUS's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. VUN's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: VUS or VUN?
VUS holds 3324 securities, while VUN holds 3324. On holdings count, VUS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VUS and VUN
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.