XCH
iShares China Index ETF

Full XCH fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

iShares China Index ETF (XCH) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XCH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while ZUT leans towards Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XCH features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, XCH has returned 8.26% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 11.61% with -$95 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.0%Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XCH
-3.66%-1.58%-8.26%-13.84%+37.55%
ZUT
-5.59%-7.33%+11.61%+17.34%+47.29%
Flows
XCH
-$2 M-$4 M+$2 M+$10 M+$71 M
ZUT
+$5 M-$17 M-$95 M-$106 M+$217 M

XCH vs ZUT exposure

Countries

XCH
China
94.08%
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%

Sectors

XCH
Finance
36.51%
Technology
20.79%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.22%
Consumer Cyclicals
9.43%
Consumer Services
7.39%
Other
15.66%
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XCH
China Construction Bank Corp.
9.01%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
8.80%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.77%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
6.27%
Xiaomi Corp.
5.49%
Meituan
5.14%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
3.86%
NetEase, Inc.
3.81%
Bank of China Ltd.
3.81%
BYD Co., Ltd.
3.56%
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%

Diversification

XCH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 51 total
58.51%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%

Characteristics

Compare
XCH
ZUT
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkFTSE China 50 Total Return Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.81%2.96%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 21, 2010January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about XCH and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCH or ZUT?
As of September 11, 2026, XCH has returned -8.26% year to date, while ZUT has returned 11.61%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCH or ZUT?
As of September 11, 2026, XCH manages $179.33 M in assets, while ZUT manages $805.63 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCH and ZUT managed?
XCH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE China 50 Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XCH and ZUT emphasize?
XCH is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCH or ZUT?
Year to date, XCH has seen +$1.82 M in net flows, compared with -$94.91 M for ZUT. XCH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCH and ZUT compare?
XCH has an expense ratio of 0.86%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of XCH and ZUT?
XCH's largest holdings include China Construction Bank Corp., Tencent Holdings Ltd., and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. ZUT's top holdings include Boralex, Inc., ATCO Ltd., and AltaGas Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCH or ZUT?
XCH holds 51 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, XCH is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XCH and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds