VS
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XCHP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while CHPS leans towards Technology. When evaluating costs, XCHP features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.64% for CHPS. Performance-wise, XCHP has returned 77.16% year-to-date with +$261 M in net flows, whereas CHPS is at 44.78% with +$130 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCHP
CHPS
| AuM | $361.77 M | $377.15 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.64% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCHP | +5.30% | -6.25% | +77.16% | +81.28% | +236.06% |
CHPS | +0.61% | -4.30% | +44.78% | +42.38% | +205.39% | |
| Flows | XCHP | +$38 M | +$63 M | +$261 M | +$255 M | +$301 M |
CHPS | -$3 M | -$3 M | +$130 M | +$143 M | +$186 M |
XCHP vs CHPS exposure
Countries
XCHP
USA
83.35%
Other
16.65%
CHPS
USA
68.99%
Taiwan
17.93%
Netherlands
9.42%
Sectors
XCHP
Technology
99.82%
CHPS
Technology
99.99%
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCHP
NVIDIA Corp.
9.42%
Micron Technology, Inc.
8.89%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
8.22%
Broadcom Inc.
7.47%
Intel Corp.
5.09%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
4.65%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.65%
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.59%
Lam Research Corp.
4.27%
KLA Corp.
4.11%
CHPS
NVIDIA Corp.
22.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.93%
Broadcom Inc.
13.22%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
10.83%
ASML Holding NV
9.42%
Lam Research Corp.
5.32%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.14%
Arm Holdings Plc
3.65%
KLA Corp.
3.23%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.61%
Diversification
XCHP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
61.36%
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
93.58%
Characteristics
Compare
XCHP
CHPS
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.17% | 0.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2023 | June 22, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XCHP and CHPS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCHP or CHPS?
As of October 15, 2026, XCHP has returned 77.16% year to date, while CHPS has returned 44.78%. XCHP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCHP or CHPS?
As of October 15, 2026, XCHP manages $361.77 M in assets, while CHPS manages $377.15 M. CHPS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCHP and CHPS managed?
XCHP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XCHP and CHPS emphasize?
XCHP is most exposed to Technology. CHPS is most exposed to Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCHP or CHPS?
Year to date, XCHP has seen +$260.54 M in net flows, compared with +$130.28 M for CHPS. XCHP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCHP and CHPS compare?
XCHP has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of XCHP and CHPS?
XCHP's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Micron Technology, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. CHPS's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCHP or CHPS?
XCHP holds 30 securities, while CHPS holds 18. On holdings count, XCHP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCHP and CHPS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.