VS
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN) and Harvest Clean Energy ETF (HCLN) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XCLN focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials, Utilities, and Technology, while HCLN leans towards Utilities, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.4% for HCLN. Performance-wise, XCLN has returned 3.48% year-to-date with +$14 M in net flows, whereas HCLN is at 12.84% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCLN
HCLN
| AuM | $27.95 M | $17.53 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.69% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.41% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCLN | -4.23% | -10.12% | +3.48% | -0.48% | +24.58% |
HCLN | -6.41% | -15.25% | -12.84% | -18.80% | -3.45% | |
| Flows | XCLN | +$1 M | +$3 M | +$14 M | +$16 M | +$23 M |
HCLN | +$0 M | -$0 M | +$1 M | -$0 M | -$9 M |
XCLN vs HCLN exposure
Countries
XCLN
USA
35.35%
China
22.28%
Other
42.37%
HCLN
USA
36.06%
Spain
9.99%
Denmark
8.66%
New Zealand
7.62%
Other
37.66%
Sectors
XCLN
Industrials
50.08%
Utilities
40.96%
Other
8.97%
HCLN
Utilities
47.25%
Industrials
41.59%
Other
11.16%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCLN
First Solar, Inc.
7.89%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.77%
Bloom Energy Corp.
7.11%
Nextpower, Inc.
6.55%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
4.58%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.56%
Equatorial SA
3.14%
EDP SA
2.92%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.86%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.67%
HCLN
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.26%
Cadeler A/S
2.98%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
2.96%
Landis+Gyr Group AG
2.81%
ReNew Energy Global Plc
2.76%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.
2.72%
Scatec ASA
2.69%
SMA Solar Technology AG
2.67%
VERBUND AG
2.65%
Mercury NZ Ltd.
2.65%
Diversification
XCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 102 total
50.06%
HCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
28.15%
Characteristics
Compare
XCLN
HCLN
| Provider | iShares | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.99% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | Yes |
| Inception Date | April 26, 2022 | January 14, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XCLN and HCLN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCLN or HCLN?
As of October 16, 2026, XCLN has returned 3.48% year to date, while HCLN has returned -12.84%. XCLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCLN or HCLN?
As of October 16, 2026, XCLN manages $27.95 M in assets, while HCLN manages $17.53 M. XCLN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCLN and HCLN managed?
XCLN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD benchmark. HCLN is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XCLN and HCLN emphasize?
XCLN is most exposed to Industrials, Utilities, and Technology. HCLN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCLN or HCLN?
Year to date, XCLN has seen +$14.40 M in net flows, compared with +$1.09 M for HCLN. XCLN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCLN and HCLN compare?
XCLN has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while HCLN has an expense ratio of 0.69%.
What are the top holdings of XCLN and HCLN?
XCLN's largest holdings include First Solar, Inc., China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., and Bloom Energy Corp.. HCLN's top holdings include Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Cadeler A/S, and GCL Technology Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCLN or HCLN?
XCLN holds 102 securities, while HCLN holds 39. On holdings count, XCLN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCLN and HCLN
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.