VS
When evaluating costs, XCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.65% for URCC. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCLN
URCC
| AuM | $27.19 M | $9.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.65% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.54% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCLN | -6.46% | -24.42% | +8.13% | +24.78% | +16.43% |
URCC | +12.00% | -10.32% | - | - | - | |
| Flows | XCLN | +$1 M | +$4 M | +$12 M | +$15 M | +$21 M |
URCC | +$2 M | +$7 M | - | - | - |
XCLN vs URCC exposure
Countries
XCLN
USA
36.38%
China
22.47%
Other
41.15%
URCC
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
XCLN
Industrials
48.54%
Utilities
41.86%
Technology
7.33%
URCC
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.93%
First Solar, Inc.
7.86%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.56%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.98%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.57%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.65%
Equatorial SA
3.30%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.71%
EDP SA
2.69%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.48%
URCC
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
XCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
49.72%
URCC
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
XCLN
URCC
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.95% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | April 26, 2022 | May 12, 2026 |
Frequently asked questions about XCLN and URCC
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCLN or URCC?
As of September 3, 2026, XCLN manages $27.19 M in assets, while URCC manages $9.27 M. XCLN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCLN and URCC managed?
XCLN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD benchmark. URCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index.
How do the fees of XCLN and URCC compare?
XCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while URCC has an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Recent articles about XCLN and URCC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.