XCLN
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF

Full XCLN fund page
VS
ZCLN
BMO Clean Energy Index ETF

Full ZCLN fund page

Compare iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN) vs BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCLN and ZCLN provide the same top sector exposures: Industrials, Utilities, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.35% for ZCLN. Performance-wise, XCLN has returned 6.99% year-to-date with +$12 M in net flows, whereas ZCLN is at 6.87% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XCLN
-7.45%-26.55%+6.99%+23.95%+15.20%
ZCLN
-7.70%-26.62%+6.87%+24.66%+15.88%
Flows
XCLN
+$1 M+$4 M+$12 M+$15 M+$21 M
ZCLN
+$0 M+$4 M+$12 M+$3 M-$1 M

XCLN vs ZCLN exposure

Countries

XCLN
USA
36.38%
China
22.47%
Other
41.15%
ZCLN
USA
36.62%
China
22.48%
Other
40.90%

Sectors

XCLN
Industrials
48.54%
Utilities
41.86%
Technology
7.33%
ZCLN
Industrials
48.76%
Utilities
41.92%
Technology
7.34%
As of September 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XCLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.93%
First Solar, Inc.
7.86%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.56%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.98%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.57%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.65%
Equatorial SA
3.30%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.71%
EDP SA
2.69%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.48%
ZCLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.95%
First Solar, Inc.
7.89%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.58%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.98%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.58%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.67%
Equatorial SA
3.32%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.71%
EDP SA
2.70%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.48%

Diversification

XCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
49.72%
ZCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
49.85%

Characteristics

Compare
XCLN
ZCLN
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CADS&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.96%1.62%
Meets ESG criteriaYesYes
Inception DateApril 26, 2022January 26, 2020

Frequently asked questions about XCLN and ZCLN

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCLN or ZCLN?
As of September 2, 2026, XCLN has returned 6.99% year to date, while ZCLN has returned 6.87%. XCLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCLN or ZCLN?
As of September 2, 2026, XCLN manages $26.90 M in assets, while ZCLN manages $74.03 M. ZCLN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCLN and ZCLN managed?
XCLN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD benchmark. ZCLN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XCLN and ZCLN emphasize?
XCLN is most exposed to Industrials, Utilities, and Technology. ZCLN is most exposed to Industrials, Utilities, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCLN or ZCLN?
Year to date, XCLN has seen +$12.37 M in net flows, compared with +$12.30 M for ZCLN. XCLN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCLN and ZCLN compare?
XCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while ZCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of XCLN and ZCLN?
XCLN's largest holdings include China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., First Solar, Inc., and Nextpower, Inc.. ZCLN's top holdings include China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., First Solar, Inc., and Nextpower, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCLN or ZCLN?
XCLN holds 103 securities, while ZCLN holds 103. On holdings count, XCLN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XCLN and ZCLN

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds