XCS
iShares S&P/TSX Small Cap Index ETF

Full XCS fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Compare iShares S&P/TSX Small Cap Index ETF (XCS) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCS provides Materials, Energy, and Real Estate exposures, while HEWB is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, XCS features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, XCS has returned 20.76% year-to-date with -$6 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 15.02% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28May 5

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 7, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XCS
+7.23%+6.21%+20.76%+79.13%+114.36%
HEWB
+9.67%+10.04%+15.02%+65.38%+121.08%
Flows
XCS
+$7 M+$5 M-$6 M-$2 M+$0 M
HEWB
+$8 M+$9 M+$12 M+$7 M-$3 M

XCS vs HEWB exposure

Countries

XCS
Canada
99.22%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

XCS
Materials
23.32%
Energy
22.51%
Other
14.43%
Real Estate
9.22%
Industrials
8.90%
Other
21.62%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of May 7, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XCS
TAMARACK VALLEY ENERGY
1.89%
METHANEX
1.87%
ATHABASCA OIL
1.83%
SPROTT
1.44%
CA3499421020
1.43%
DENISON MINES
1.40%
CA01921D2041
1.40%
BAYTEX ENERGY
1.38%
KINAXIS
1.32%
CA8139211038
1.32%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

XCS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 233 total
15.28%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
XCS
HEWB
ProvideriSharesGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P/TSX Smallcap Total Return Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.05%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 14, 2007January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about XCS and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCS or HEWB?
As of May 7, 2026, XCS has returned 20.76% year to date, while HEWB has returned 15.02%. XCS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCS or HEWB?
As of May 7, 2026, XCS manages $258.63 M in assets, while HEWB manages $290.21 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCS and HEWB managed?
XCS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Smallcap Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XCS and HEWB emphasize?
XCS is most exposed to Materials, Energy, and Real Estate. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCS or HEWB?
Year to date, XCS has seen -$5.80 M in net flows, compared with +$12.19 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCS and HEWB compare?
XCS has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XCS and HEWB?
XCS's largest holdings include TAMARACK VALLEY ENERGY and METHANEX. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XCS or HEWB?
XCS holds 198 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, XCS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XCS and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds