VS
Compare iShares S&P/TSX Small Cap Index ETF (XCS) vs BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCS provides Non-Energy Materials, Energy, and Finance exposures, while ZEB is primarily weighted in Finance. When evaluating costs, XCS features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, XCS has returned 21.69% year-to-date with -$9 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 31.45% with +$598 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCS
ZEB
| AuM | $255.23 M | $7,549.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.93% | -0.54% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCS | -0.80% | +2.28% | +21.69% | +40.57% | +116.68% |
ZEB | -2.02% | +2.04% | +31.45% | +49.71% | +155.58% | |
| Flows | XCS | +$0 M | -$7 M | -$9 M | -$9 M | -$1 M |
ZEB | +$333 M | +$1,133 M | +$598 M | +$1,233 M | -$216 M |
XCS vs ZEB exposure
Countries
XCS
Canada
95.11%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
XCS
Non-Energy Materials
30.88%
Energy
20.03%
Finance
16.41%
Industrials
12.20%
Other
20.47%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCS
BlackBerry Ltd.
2.16%
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
2.15%
Methanex Corp.
1.73%
Athabasca Oil Corp.
1.70%
Kinaxis, Inc.
1.50%
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.
1.46%
Dream Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust
1.37%
Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd.
1.34%
Ero Copper Corp.
1.33%
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
1.27%
ZEB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
XCS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 227 total
16.01%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
XCS
ZEB
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX Smallcap Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.25% | 2.32% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2007 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about XCS and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCS or ZEB?
As of September 17, 2026, XCS has returned 21.69% year to date, while ZEB has returned 31.45%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCS or ZEB?
As of September 17, 2026, XCS manages $255.23 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.55 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCS and ZEB managed?
XCS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Smallcap Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XCS and ZEB emphasize?
XCS is most exposed to Non-Energy Materials, Energy, and Finance. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCS or ZEB?
Year to date, XCS has seen -$8.93 M in net flows, compared with +$598.16 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCS and ZEB compare?
XCS has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XCS and ZEB?
XCS's largest holdings include BlackBerry Ltd., Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd., and Methanex Corp.. ZEB's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Which ETF is more diversified: XCS or ZEB?
XCS holds 227 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, XCS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCS and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.