XCS
iShares S&P/TSX Small Cap Index ETF

Full XCS fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Compare iShares S&P/TSX Small Cap Index ETF (XCS) vs BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCS provides Non-Energy Materials, Energy, and Finance exposures, while ZUT is primarily weighted in Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XCS features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, XCS has returned 14.94% year-to-date with -$16 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 19.69% with -$73 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.06.0%Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 3, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XCS
-5.15%-2.10%+14.94%+28.76%+113.62%
ZUT
+5.12%-1.24%+19.69%+12.51%+68.71%
Flows
XCS
-$7 M-$3 M-$16 M-$1 M-$6 M
ZUT
-$16 M+$47 M-$73 M-$14 M+$248 M

XCS vs ZUT exposure

Countries

XCS
Canada
95.61%
ZUT
Canada
83.93%
Bermuda
16.07%

Sectors

XCS
Non-Energy Materials
35.57%
Energy
19.59%
Finance
15.09%
Industrials
12.52%
Other
17.24%
ZUT
Utilities
83.24%
Energy
8.44%
Industrials
8.32%
As of November 3, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XCS
Ero Copper Corp.
1.84%
Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd.
1.75%
Athabasca Oil Corp.
1.68%
Russel Metals, Inc.
1.67%
Kinaxis, Inc.
1.63%
Fortuna Mining Corp.
1.60%
Trekor Metals Ltd.
1.56%
Bird Construction, Inc.
1.53%
Baytex Energy Corp.
1.39%
Enerflex Ltd.
1.33%
ZUT
Northland Power, Inc.
9.17%
TransAlta Corp.
8.59%
ATCO Ltd.
8.53%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.44%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.43%
Fortis, Inc.
8.34%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.32%
Capital Power Corp.
8.27%
Emera, Inc.
8.26%
Hydro One Ltd.
8.15%

Diversification

XCS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 233 total
15.98%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.50%

Characteristics

Compare
XCS
ZUT
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P/TSX Smallcap Total Return Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.63%2.78%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 14, 2007January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about XCS and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCS or ZUT?
As of November 3, 2026, XCS has returned 14.94% year to date, while ZUT has returned 19.69%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCS or ZUT?
As of November 3, 2026, XCS manages $232.88 M in assets, while ZUT manages $883.26 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCS and ZUT managed?
XCS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Smallcap Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XCS and ZUT emphasize?
XCS is most exposed to Non-Energy Materials, Energy, and Finance. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCS or ZUT?
Year to date, XCS has seen -$15.84 M in net flows, compared with -$72.83 M for ZUT. XCS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCS and ZUT compare?
XCS has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of XCS and ZUT?
XCS's largest holdings include Ero Copper Corp., Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd., and Athabasca Oil Corp.. ZUT's top holdings include Northland Power, Inc., TransAlta Corp., and ATCO Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCS or ZUT?
XCS holds 232 securities, while ZUT holds 12. On holdings count, XCS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XCS and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds