VS
Compare iShares S&P/TSX Small Cap Index ETF (XCS) vs BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCS provides Non-Energy Materials, Energy, and Finance exposures, while ZUT is primarily weighted in Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XCS features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, XCS has returned 21.69% year-to-date with -$9 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 13.5% with -$98 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCS
ZUT
| AuM | $255.23 M | $816.53 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.93% | -0.80% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCS | -0.80% | +2.28% | +21.69% | +40.57% | +116.68% |
ZUT | -3.88% | -5.92% | +13.50% | +18.46% | +48.04% | |
| Flows | XCS | +$0 M | -$7 M | -$9 M | -$9 M | -$1 M |
ZUT | +$14 M | -$33 M | -$98 M | -$105 M | +$220 M |
XCS vs ZUT exposure
Countries
XCS
Canada
95.11%
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%
Sectors
XCS
Non-Energy Materials
30.88%
Energy
20.03%
Finance
16.41%
Industrials
12.20%
Other
20.47%
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCS
BlackBerry Ltd.
2.16%
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
2.15%
Methanex Corp.
1.73%
Athabasca Oil Corp.
1.70%
Kinaxis, Inc.
1.50%
Secure Waste Infrastructure Corp.
1.46%
Dream Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust
1.37%
Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd.
1.34%
Ero Copper Corp.
1.33%
Aya Gold & Silver, Inc.
1.27%
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%
Diversification
XCS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 227 total
16.01%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%
Characteristics
Compare
XCS
ZUT
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX Smallcap Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.25% | 2.91% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2007 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about XCS and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCS or ZUT?
As of September 17, 2026, XCS has returned 21.69% year to date, while ZUT has returned 13.50%. XCS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCS or ZUT?
As of September 17, 2026, XCS manages $255.23 M in assets, while ZUT manages $816.53 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCS and ZUT managed?
XCS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Smallcap Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XCS and ZUT emphasize?
XCS is most exposed to Non-Energy Materials, Energy, and Finance. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCS or ZUT?
Year to date, XCS has seen -$8.93 M in net flows, compared with -$97.69 M for ZUT. XCS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCS and ZUT compare?
XCS has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of XCS and ZUT?
XCS's largest holdings include BlackBerry Ltd., Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd., and Methanex Corp.. ZUT's top holdings include Boralex, Inc., ATCO Ltd., and AltaGas Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCS or ZUT?
XCS holds 227 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, XCS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCS and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.